My Event Ratings

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: Great Race and well organised
In full: Superb support throughout the half and full marathon. Well stocked drinks stations. Brilliant weather. Thought that the course had improved since 2004. The University section and Woolaton Park were quite scenic and I enjoyed running along the Trent from Mile 22 onwards. Only minor gripe was getting into and out of Car Park A.This took ages and next time I would go to Car Park B and walk.
Date of review: September 15, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Superbly scenic challenging 10k, brilliant weather, great atmospheree,
In full: Superbly scenic challenging 10k, brilliant weather, great atmosphere. When they said rough track, they really did mean it! Great fun. A lot of runners started to walk near the top of the second hill-still it was at 1300ft!
Date of review: May 15, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Challenging hilly 10k
In full: Three hilly laps around Cheddleton. Coming past the start for the last lap you knew that the steepest hill on the course was there ahead of you. Third time round it slowed me down considerably! Great atmosphere, well marshalled and supported considering the cold wet weather
Date of review: December 5, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Well organised race with cheery marshals, despite the cold we windy weather. A few hills but nothing too hideous and a goody bag like nothing you have seen before.
Date of review: December 13, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Well organised race, undulating rather than hilly, good value for money
Date of review: October 9, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: excellent race in good weather conditions, well organised, could do with chip timing though
Date of review: March 20, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Good challenging course with some nice scenery, very well marshalled and organised
Date of review: December 11, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Race benefitted from good weather conditions (not too hot or cold with little or no wind)
In full: Third time I have run the Macc half. Enjoyed it so much more than 2003. Had plenty of energy towards the end and this time I was ready for the climb from 10 to 12 miles!
Date of review: October 4, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: fast relatively flat race in good weather
In full: Could have done with more distance markers, plus a water station
Date of review: May 5, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator