In short: Nice run In full: Enjoyable run. Two and a bit laps of the attractive Danson Park. Mildly undulating with a mixed terrain of grass, tarmac and pavement. Due to the recent wet weather, there was a long stretch of boggy grass which meant that a fast speed was difficult. I was hoping to get under 1 hours, but lost out by 45 seconds - I blame the boggy conditions!
Very chilly waiting for the start, and I regretted not paying the £1.50 for the car park, as I would have been able to wait in the warmth and comfort of my car, and also I could have gone to the pub right by the finish. By the time I had walked back to my car to get changed, I didn't fancy walking back to the pub. So, yes, it is possible to park for free in the street, but you'll have a ten minute walk there and a 10 minute walk back.
This is a low key local race in a pleasant setting. There is little in the way of extras, but it's one of those plain, straightforward, no frills events that are the backbone of the running scene. The organisers are friendly and relaxed, and there were no problems with the organisation. Entries on the day are allowed right up to about ten minutes before the start. At the finish there is a pleasant medal and a small bottle of water. I am told that you can use the showers. This is a decent, enjoyable run, and I wouldn't mind doing it again as it's reasonably local to me. Date of review: May 24, 2012
In short: Good course, bad organisation In full: The well organised run is the exception rather than the rule, so as a runner you expect that things will not always be smooth or perfect, and take it all in your stride. Clubs are well meaning, and events are often run and manned by volunteers. However, the organisation of this event has to take the award for the worse ever. When the poor organisation interferes with your enjoyment or even participation of an event then it has to be bad.
Everyone else sends out the numbers, this club asks you to turn up on the day, then doesn't prepare adequately for that. They inform you they have parking facilities, and then take on more runners than the facilities can cope with, and make no arrangements for back up parking. Either limit the numbers, use a different venue, or tell people there is limited parking, and advise them in advance of where to park. Take a look at what other clubs do.
The hall, as people have pointed out, was very crowded. There was very poor signage, so it wasn't easy to find out where you had to go to collect your number. My name wasn't down, even though I had paid by cheque in advance. I was sent to two different places to sort out matters, and at the late entries stall I was told they couldn't help me as the laptop didn't contain all the information. I said that their inability to organise matters effectively shouldn't mean I couldn't run - after all I had paid. The man at the stall said, Are you calling us poorly organised? I said, you lost my application, and are now telling me you can't help me, what do you call it? They gave me a number.
After time lost to finding somewhere park, and then to get my number, it was too late to get any of the refreshments that had been promised, nor to find the toilets. I had lost my running partner in the number chaos, so had to make my way to start without him. Who thought it was a good idea to have the start facing the direction of the HQ so those arriving were faced with runners blocking the road, and various wires and equipment blocking the side? Grrrr. At this point I was very frustrated and thinking that the organisers were perhaps rather inept.
I paid little attention to the water stops. My experience of most races is that water stops can't be relied on for slow runners, so I always carry my own. Marshals were out, and - given it was a cold day - did a decent enough job. The course itself was pleasant, and at places very attractive; while it also had pot holes in section, it was on the whole a decent course - challenging, attractive, and with a down hill finish. My sort of course, and I would be willing to consider it again for the course, and that it is handy for a visit to Canterbury afterwards.
The finish was poorly indicated. Even though there were useful signs on the road saying 400 and 200 yards to go, it still wasn't clear where the finish was until you were on top of it, and a marshal pointed it out (you had to leave the road and use the pavement). There was no water by the time I finished (1.45). The medal was fairly pointless, and I would have preferred the money had been spent on some fruit or sports drink. Date of review: January 31, 2012
In short: Pleasant enough but less than ordinary In full: I enjoyed the run. The weather was good, and the course went through countryside - not spectacular countryside, but decent countryside nevertheless. I enjoyed the course. Indeed, I would recommend it. That is not to say that the race was anything special, but it was pleasant, and provided you don't have much in the way of expectations, then it does the job nicely. An early morning run in January, through decent countryside over a challenging but not aggressive course, with plenty of friendly marshals. And, as it's held in St Albans, there's the opportunity for a decent pub crawl afterwards.
I didn't use the suggested car park. I parked in a sidestreet near the start/finish point. As I wanted the loo before the start, I did go to the race HQ, and noted that there were plenty of parking spaces available. There was no loo paper, but this is not uncommon, and experienced runners should bring their own.
The start was a little messy. People seemed unsure where they needed to be, but - again - having been to a number of such low key club runs, one learns to expect this. I didn't notice any signs pointing to the start, but I had read the fairly decent instructions beforehand, and there were enough runners heading in the right direction to guide the way.
There were at least two water stops (the same one actually), which consisted of water cups, and I did notice some jelly babies, but too late to grab any!
At the loop end the organisers had the returning runners crossing over in front of the outgoing runners, which seemed clumsy. Why not have the outgoing loop turn left, so there is no crossover? Also, the marshals, while pleasant, could be a little more alert in giving directions. They are sometimes poorly placed, and more than once I had to ask which direction. Indeed, at the loop crossover, one marshal was blocking the way I had to go, and only moved aside when I was asking which was the way I had to go. It helps if marshals point the way as soon as they see a runner coming.
No goodies, water or bananas at the end. Often goodies are donated by sponsors - it's just a question of the club being proactive. The medal was decent quality, but not individual. If you're an experienced runner you'll already have it, with some other race name scratched on the back. For ordinary club runs like this, I'm not fussed about medals anyway. I'd rather have some sports drink and nibbles. Or a hat or a t-shirt, or a sweat band. Something a little different, perhaps.
All in all, pleasant enough, but rather less than ordinary. I'd do it again, but it's not a favourite race. Date of review: January 29, 2012
In short: Probably the best marathon in the world In full: and the toughest!
This run is perfect. You feel high on the fun and exhilaration of it, the madness of it, the charm of it, the stunning scenery, the supportive marshals, and the crazy food they provide at each stop. Do you fancy tea and cake, or a hot soup? Everyone is so friendly. It's such a wonderful atmosphere.
I did the Great North Run last month. From the ridiculous to the sublime. From an over-priced, congested, uninspiring and ugly course at Great North to the magnificence and warmth of the Beachy Head. From spending hours in my car trying to get out of the car park at Great North, to a hot shower and a slap up meal before wandering over to the pub at Beachy Head.
People always talk about the toughness of this run, but you don't get people collapsing with exhaustion or heart attacks, and that's because the run is varied - you use different muscle groups on the ups than you do on the downs and on the flats (few flats!), and also because you don't run it flat out, you have to walk at times, and this gives the body time to recover. It's very demanding, but it's not damaging to the body (well, apart from the toe nails because the steep descents push your feet to the front of your shoes!), and the organisers provide plenty of fuel at the checkpoints.
Great race. Legendary. Date of review: October 24, 2011
In short: Biggest, but far from the best In full: GNR is the biggest half-marathon, and attracts attention for that fact. But is if far from the best - indeed, in most respects, it is actually very poor. It is a race that most people will have heard of, and the iconic sight of the Red Arrows flying over Tyne Bridge is very inspirational. It's a race that you want to do - it's a race that you are almost compelled to do because of its status and fame. It's certainly a race I felt was a "must do".
I enjoyed the weekend up in Newcastle. Accommodation in Newcastle itself sells out very quickly, or is stunningly expensive. We stayed in a very pleasant caravan site north of Newcastle, within easy reach of South Shields. It was very cheap, very comfortable, and made for a very pleasant weekend break. We thoroughly enjoyed ourselves.
The race itself, though, was very disappointing. The pasta party on the Saturday was a miserable affair and was best avoided. I have been to a number of Pasta parties around the world, and usually they are inspirational affairs (well, the London Marathon one was a bit limp this year), but the quality of the food, and the location (a car park) was off-putting. It served as a warning that this was an event where things were not really organised with the runner's pleasure in mind, but of simply ticking a box in the cheapest, easiest manner - Pasta Party, done.
The information booklet is packed with information - but not easy to get the information you want, and the information changes depending on which page you read. And the information is not accurate, or is simply missing. Price of bus in the booklet - £3. Price of bus on the day - £3.30. It mentions a car park in South Shields, but doesn't say how to get to it, nor that when you arrive on the day, there is a £4 fee. Signposts to the car park are rare to the point of almost not existing. The bus leaves you a little distance from the start - not a problem, but there are no sign posts, and no marshals to help. Compare that to the London Marathon, where there is plenty of help on the ground with signs and marshals. You follow the crowd and trust that the person in front knows where they are going.
The start area is not well organised, signposted or equipped with toilets or marshals. It's largely a messy free for all with people pissing and shitting in the bushes by the side of the road. It's all good humoured, and people help each other out by pointing to where you enter the start area proper. But starting a race, especially such a big race, in this location is a poor idea, and is very badly managed. The only other race I've known which has a comparably poorly organised start is the London 10K.
The timed pens are not well organised - people are allowed to give optimistic or deliberately inaccurate times in order to get into the front pens, so that the whole idea of timed pens is a nonsense. You will be blocked by hoards of slower runners/walkers from the start to the finish. To some extent with a race of this size you expect some congestion, but the reality of the amount is simply frustrating and unpleasant - it can be compared to the first day of the sales at a big London department store. You will get jostled and knocked, and will have to stop several times, and will run more than the 13 mile distance because of all the weaving and dodging. You might as well put down that you can do it in 70 minutes and give yourself the chance of some space. The pens fill up quickly, and people will continue to shove in until the last minute so you can't relax, as there will be intense crowding and shuffling going on. And your view while waiting will be the motorway embankment either side.
The rout is appalling. It is mainly a dreary dual carriageway passing through business zones or indifferent residential areas. For the first couple of miles it is inner city motorway, with no access for spectators, other than on occasional bridges. The highlights are the Tyne Bridge, and the finish near the coast at South Shields. The rest is dreary, with - despite what is claimed - very patchy and often indifferent crowd support. Yes, people do turn up, but considering the fame of this event, and the huge number of people who live in Tyneside, the support is very sad. There are people who hand out sweets, biscuits and tissues, but they are the exception, and the crowd support is not the same as you get during the London Marathon, Run To The Beat, or Hastings Half. There are many events which I have been to which are low key, local events, with no expectation of crowd support, and I am frequently touched by the amount of people who turn out. Here I was expecting more - indeed, people say the support is fantastic. But it's not true. The bulk of the people who turn out, mainly stare. There is little actual encouragement. I have my name on my shirt, and I'm used to hearing people call out my name. On this run my name was called just twice. So the route is dreary with patchy support, and the organisers do little to encourage the crowd support, or to inspire and encourage the runners. There is one "boost zone", and I think three live bands for the entire race. Even small local events can often manage to hire a bagpipe player. For the world's biggest half-marathon, and for a fee of £46, I was hoping for a bit more than one guy shouting out people's names for a hundred yards, and a scattering of bands. The locals at Hastings organise themselves every year, so you have several choirs singing, and pubs blasting out music, and the nurses at the local hospital banging saucepans and whooping so loud you can hear them from a mile away. The Marseille-Cassis has go-go dancers at the halfway point. The Amsterdam marathon has fairground organs scattered throughout. Paris supplies beer, wine, cider, cake and oysters. Prague supplies beer. Here, there is little fun, little support, and the bare minimum of water and sports drinks. What exactly did I pay for?
Getting away from South Shields at the end is a nightmare. If you thought the race was bad enough, just wait until you try to get away from it. The average time is two and a half hours. Because they have a helicopter pad for the celebrities to get away quickly, and the pad is placed between the finish and the car park, it took me over half an hour to get to my car, which was parked 500 yards from the finish. There is simply no crowd control. People push both ways down a congested roped off lane, which may get closed off if an ambulance needs to get to the finish. Ah! nightmare!
The positives are the friendliness of the other runners. The sheer size of the event so you know you are taking part in something big. The Red Arrows - they fly over the start, they fly again over the bridge, and they do a spectacular display at the finish, which I enjoyed as I was arriving at the finish as that happened. But those positives do not compensate for the rest. This could be not just the biggest half-marathon, but also the best if the organisers committed themselves into thinking what the runners might appreciate, rather than how little they can give and get away with it.
The race might be a victim of its own success, but I think it is more likely that its a victim of complacency. The event is a commercial and popular success - people swallow the short-comings and don't complain, so why make the effort to change it? Why make the effort to make it brilliant when people are happy enough as it is?
I'm hearing grumblings of discontent, and I think its time those grumblings came a bit louder, and people started demanding improvements. Date of review: October 14, 2011
In short: Declining..... In full: I did this in 2006 and 2007, and felt that this was a special event. Low key, and a bit of a drive, with nothing extra to offer, just the course, it was special because of that course, and the relaxed low key Sunday morning feel about it. I found Henfield itself a quaint village - nothing remarkable, but it has some nice pubs, and genuine English feel about it. The course through the countryside was very attractive - picking your way through cornfields, and along disused railway lines, beside a lazy river, and through cow fields was very charming. And then to come back to laze on the field by the leisure centre while people had a BBQ and chatted, and then to wander off to the pub for a pint. Great. But the course has changed, and the number of entrants has dropped, and the organisation seems to have drifted away. There is now nothing on offer when you get back. No club atmosphere, and no BBQ. The runners are friendly and chatty, and the marshals are supportive, but there's something missing about the whole affair. I didn't like the half mile walk to the start. Nor did I like the tedium of much of the course. The changes now mean that the course consists either of running along the disused railway (out and back) or along the river bank, with very little else. I have fond memories of this race, but I may not be back.....
In short: Going downhill... In full: I used to love this run. I haven't done it since 2008 (when I did it in 2.20), so this was my first time on the new course, and it is likely to be my last.
I didn't like the extra hill loop which breaks up the long straight. I didn't like the different hill at mile 10 which replaces the old climb at mile 9. The previous climb was pleasant and under tree shade. The new one is along an ugly, dirty road, exposed to the sun. I didn't like the awkward switchbacks and various tunnels and road crossings with few marshals to help out. I hated the frustrating extra loops around the park at the end. Those loops could be done at the start. And it's a shame that there were not enough bananas and goodie bags. It's not nice struggling in at the end of a long run to see others eating bananas, and evidence of the bananas everywhere, and nothing left! It has to be fair to all. My money went to pay for those bananas as much as everyone else. I should have known though, as this race has a history of running out of water at drinks stations. It was because of this race's poor organisation of water that I now make sure I always carry my own bottle during long runs. Unless, of course, I am running a properly organised race such as London Marathon. It's better to have too much water and bananas than not enough - and better to ask everyone to pay an extra £1 each to make sure there is enough than to try and keep the run cheap, and then skimp on these important details.
I am prepared to put up with a few faults on a run, but the faults on this run are mounting up. Date of review: July 26, 2011
In short: Big race - hideous course - poor sponsor In full: London is THE marathon to do. It is a major marathon, and possibly the most famous. The organisation is smooth and professional from start to finish. The crowd support is intense at places, and pretty good all the way round. You really are aware you are taking part in a significant event. It is not, however, the best marathon you can do, nor the best run.
The course is hideous. I've waited five years to run this marathon and often looked at the course and pondered that it goes through some dreary parts of London, but thought that the event itself and the crowd support would compensate. Well, frankly, no it doesn't. Running through street after street of ugly tenement buildings, closed down pubs and factories is not inspiring. Most city marathons have their bad patches spaced out amongst the awe-inspiring, historic, iconic scenery, but London has the good patches spaced out amongst the dreary route that makes up about 20 miles of the 26. Surely it's possible to run the course through some better parts of London. It is extraordinary that the course somehow manages to weave its way through all the worse parts of London!
While it's undeniable there's a wonderful atmosphere about the event itself - there is a lack of warmth and understanding coming from the sponsor. The Expo was purely commercial - very disappointing. The worse city marathon expo I've attended. Almost demoralising. Virgin is pushing the money side of the event, and seems to neglect the running side. Yes, this is the biggest charity event in the world - but it is not a charity event that happens to be a marathon, it is a marathon that happens to also be a charity event. The focus must be on the running, not on the raising of money, or the making of money. The events on the Expo stage were almost all commercial - "here's the clothes you can buy - now go buy them at the stall behind you". Paris Expo was great because while there was stuff to buy, the focus was on building an atmosphere. The Paris Pasta Party is an uplifting experience. Great party atmosphere. And you can fill up with as much pasta and fruit as you like. Go back for more as often as you like. Watch the stage show which is for fun only. Gives you a great feeling. And the party is included in the entry fee. As is the 5k "Breakfast Run" which you can do on the Saturday morning. Excellent value for money.
I dislike that Virgin have stopped the guaranteed entry for five consecutive ballot failures. This punishes those who can't afford a charity entry or are unable to raise the money from asking others.
As with others I felt that the t-shirt was very poor - among the very worse I have been given, though I had no complaints about the goodie bags - I thought they were OK.
I thought the finish zone could do with having water bottles ready. I had finished all my water, and was looking forward to some water at the finish. The finish zone is very long and depressing. It just seemed to go on for ever - but, fair enough, that is not uncommon for big events.
I was impressed when I got on the train at Rochester at how many other runners there were from my town doing the marathon. It gives you a sense of how big the event is. The walk from Blackheath station to the start was very exciting. A big flow of people. There were marshals placed to guide the runners - but they weren't needed - you just had to follow the crowd!
Overall I enjoyed the day, and was pleased that family members managed to see me at several spots along the route, but it's not an event I'm that interested in doing again. There are plenty of interesting city marathons around the world that I haven't yet done. And of the marathons that I have done so far that I'd be happy to do again are Beachy Head (entered again this year), Paris (probably do next year) and Prague. I'm also keen on doing the French Riveria Marathon, Berlin Marathon and Marathon du Medoc. Date of review: May 10, 2011
In short: Cracking run - shame about the traffic In full: I loved this run. Good venue for the start and finish. Bananas and sports drinks and a medal and t-shirt. Bargain! Great atmosphere.
The route is very similar to the Dartford Half - though the start is from a different venue, and the course goes through an industrial estate before joining the main road. It's then almost the same until the final hill, apart from taking a slightly different (longer) route through the country lanes at one point.
On the long main road leading to the hill, the Half is organised so the road is crossed by the foot bridge and you run safely on pavement all the way. This 10 is organised slightly differently so you have to run in the road for about half a mile. There were sometimes cones and sometimes not. But there was always a lot of traffic, including large articulated lorries. And then up the final hill, the route goes round a blind bend. I don't like to be on a road with my back to the traffic. I have met two runners who were hit in the back by traffic while on organised runs. One is still running, but suffers constant pain, the other now does wheelchair races only. If doing this run again, I would be inclined to run on the pavement, and on the side of the road where I am facing the traffic. Though I would prefer if the organisers altered the route slightly to reduce the risk of runners being hit.
My other, more minor quibble, is that at one point I was the final runner, and the police van followed me a little too close for comfort.
Those quibbles aside, I loved this run, and I was pleased with my time of 1.46. I had aimed roughly at 1.45 (not wanting to push too hard as I'm now tapering for London) and would have made it if not for that final hill!
In short: Cracking little run in brilliant weather. Loved it. In full: I did this two years ago and enjoyed it. It was even better this time. Weather was glorious, and I was expecting the undulations so I took them in my stride (though I hadn't remembered quite how steep that little climb is at the end of 6K!). Everyone is friendly and chatty, and there's a lovely warm atmosphere.
The route undulates through Farningham and Lullingstone and a hop farm, with a cross country climb from 5K that will slow you down, and a short but stiff climb at the end of 6k. The last 3k are pretty much all downhill into Eynsford, so a fast fun finish is assured.
The only stretch I don't like is the main road from 7K to about 8K - it's dull, and there are cars zooming past. There was a delay with the water at the end. People queued for quite a while. Having two water containers would help. But these are minor quibbles - this is lovely run with a unique and special medal. I think everyone should run the Darent Valley 10K at least once in their lives. Date of review: April 10, 2011