My Event Ratings

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: weel organised, nice cakes, lots of sports drinks
In full: Very well organised race with good provision of sports drinks on the way round and also at the end, with the cakes. Full marks to the local resident trying to beat the recession by selling drinks, pity runners don't carry much cash!
Great fun, lovely weather
Date of review: July 5, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Really really beautiful race, difficult to fault
In full: Did the training weeked from 209 as well which was brilliant fun. I would recommend the race to everyone, good mix of terrain, enough hills but not too many, fast finish. Beautiful.
Date of review: May 17, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: very enjoyable, jolly marshalls, nice mug and chocolate
Date of review: May 10, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: as good as ever
In full: Appeciated the non-disposable cups, may have had them last year and I didn't notice. Fab anyway
Date of review: May 3, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: pretty much perfect
In full: the only improvement would be a sign saying 'start'.
Date of review: April 12, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Nice local race
In full: Could have done with a lot more water stops! but I understand that last year was wet, and the forecast was bad, so there are excuses.
Apart from that it was great, the marshalls were so very encouraging that it made the effort a lot less painful.
Date of review: April 10, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: very good race, organisation was impressive
In full: Lucky it wasn't held when the G20 was on, they must have borrowed every policeman in Kent. Very good.
Date of review: April 5, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		40%

In short: low key but efficient organisation
In full: A race with few frills, but all the essentials well covered. Good signs, good parking, enough toilets, enough water, some jelly babies. Very nice route, but I was so pleased I wasn't doing the 21. Any race that goes down Hogspudding lane has to be a winner
Date of review: March 29, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: just as good as always
Date of review: March 15, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Leithal but lovely
In full: Just as good as last year, the loss of the maltesers balanced by the lack of hail. Many thanks to all for a great event.
Date of review: March 8, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator