In short: I love it! In full: I like big running events, especially London ones, and there are not that many so this is a welcome addition to the calendar. The route covers some interesting ground, including Greenwich Park, Royal Artillery Barracks and the Royal Arsenal, and quite a chunk of London is blocked off for most of the day, so the entry fee is good value, especially when even an event doing laps in the local municipal park costs £15 these days. Energy drinks and packs are given out, though as sometimes happens in running events, these ran out so the tail enders got nothing. This has occurred even in IAAF Gold Label events, so is not unusual - I think it may be because some runners take more than one drink or energy pack.
I ran this in 2008 when it was wet and cold and there was hardly any crowd support. It was much better this time. There was decent support for most of the course, and at times it was really uplifting, with crowds screaming and cheering. The end was particularly good - a real wall of noise.
The organisation at the start/finish was much better than in 2008, and it is encouraging that the organisers are making improvements, but could be improved further. Clear and obvious signage to direct people along a single route to the pens, and at the end to the exit, would be really helpful. The idea that tired and confused people wandering aimlessly in a crowd would be able to sort out their own goodie bags was a mistake, and the organisers should take responsibility for assembling the contents themselves, and ensuring that every competitor gets a bag (and only one bag! Some races put a line through your number when you've been given your bag). I think part of the goodie bag problem was that the start was delayed, so some people starting handing out foil blankets and cereal bars at the start in order to keep those waiting warm and happy.
I take part in this because I like big events in big cities, and I like the course (both for the location, and that it goes up and then down - a profile that suits me), so I'm not fussed about the music, but it does seem ironic that an event that is promoted as a music and running event has fewer live bands than at a number of half marathons and marathons I've done.
Overall I really enjoyed this and will be back. And I expect that it will be better organised next year. Yes, it's not perfect, but the majority of running events are not. Date of review: October 1, 2010
In short: Love it In full: This is the second time I've done it. Great atmosphere. Feels special to run through the centre of London. Running across Westminster Bridge makes the whole experience worth while. Good DJ spots to give encouragement. It's a fun race rather than a serious race. There are lots of small, cheap, local 10K races taking place every weekend, and those are great for club runners, and for getting a PB. This is a big, once a year fun run through the centre of London. Take it for what it is and you won't be surprised or disappointed. Date of review: August 29, 2010
In short: Varied In full: Overall I enjoyed the run, though wouldn't do it again. There's a chance of some good views along the Pilgrims Way, and much of the course is through pleasant trails. Having said that, to be fair, all cross-country runs I have done have offered the same quality views or better, but didn't take you through some rather awful fly-tipping sites. There is clearly a severe problem in this area, and it made for some quite unpleasant sections toward the end. Added to that the course leads through trials used by off-roaders, so the ground is cut up and scarred - in places it was was like running through a war zone. I was stunned at the sort of damage the off-road vehicles can do. The race length is just short of nine miles, which is OK once you know that, but if you don't, and think it's just over 7 miles, then it can be disheartening to reach the halfway water station so far down on time. Thankfully the marshal there told me the truth, so I could relax. The marshals were very good, and there is a very friendly, relaxed atmosphere. The Mars Bar in the goodie bag is very enjoyable. And it's handy having a Sweat Shop stall at race HQ.
My favourite cross-country run near Medway is the North Downs run, and this run, though pleasant, doesn't match up to that. Date of review: August 29, 2010
In short: Awesome! In full: This is a stunning run. Great countryside, and solid, warming, reassuring organisation. It is, however, a challenge, and I made mistakes. I ran too fast at the start in a vain attempt to keep up with the others so I wouldn't get lost too soon. That left me very tired for the finish, and I came in nearly an hour slower than I could have done if I'd paced myself. The course is very challenging in places - not just the hills, but the rough ground underfoot: freshly (and deeply) ploughed fields, uneven and loose surfaces, tree roots, flints, assorted muddy patches. Add all that to a bit of map reading, the inevitable getting lost here and there, and a fairly fast field so that I was all alone for the last half, made me, um, "uncomfortable" by the finish so I did swear a bit and mutter "never again" as I fell over the finish line. However, by the time I write this, just over a week later, my legs have stopped aching, and I managed a half marathon on Sunday in world record time (well, my personal world record), so I am warming to the event and thinking back fondly to it. I have a running partner who seems keen on doing this, so if he does enter I will be assured of company, and will be able to better pace myself. So - I am seriously considering doing this again. Maybe.... Date of review: October 7, 2008
In short: Attractive flat course - appalling organisation! In full: I enjoyed the run - it's an attractive course, and very flat. And it has something of the buzz of a big race. But there are too many problems, mainly to do with the organisation by Swansea council.
In my experience the best organised races tend to be those done by runners for runners, because there is a passion and commitment, and an understanding of what a runner wants from a race.
I had heard great things about this 10K, so it was on my "must do" list, and I came from Kent to take part. I have family in Swansea so it was a great opportunity to mix a family get together with a bit of running.
The first sign that things were not right were when my race pack didn't arrive and I had to make a couple of phone calls to sort it out. Fair enough, but it appears I wasn't the only one not to get their pack.
I shrugged that off as one of those things that can happen. I'm still very positive - no reason not to be. We arrive at the race and notice huge queues for the toilets. My wife comments on this, and me, being positive and still believing this is the best 10K in the UK, shrugs it off as something that happens at big races, though it niggles me a bit as the queues really are very long and I would like to make sure my bladder is empty.
I get into the starting pens. No organisation to sort people into the right times - just a few signs. OK - this part is often poor at races, but the best organised runs I've attended do make more of an effort to get this right.
There's a really poorly done warm up routine. No music, no motivation, no enthusiasm, just a buzzing tannoy. People start doing it and gradually everyone loses interest. Dreadful! What a demotivating start to a race.
At last we set off. We start off with the whole width of the road. This is a popular run, so even with the full width (four lanes) people get in the way. Those who started too far forward are holding up those behind. I'm OK with this - it's the downside of taking part in a big event, and I'm prepared to accept that. But then, as we pass the university the four cones are coned off in a very short distance into two lanes. Ouch! Much bumping and barging and slowing down. Many runners go the wrong side of the cones in order to get past the slower runners. The problem with this, is that cars are now coming along the other way! OK - these things happen.
I'm accepting of all this, but I am starting to feel this is not the well organised race I had been expecting. Where are the nice touches - the music, the little treats, the extra water stops with jelly babies? What we get is the required minimum water station at 5K. OK - fair enough. And then I get to that water station and find that the marshalls there cannot cope with the flow of people, and are trying to open boxes as fast as they can, but are failing. That concerns me, but I manage to get a bottle and again push that concern to the back of my mind and enjoy the rest of the race.
We get to the end, and enter one of the longest filter tunnels I have yet encountered and then everything just falls apart. Who organised the handing out of the goodie bags? Appalling! I had family to meet and so decided after standing still for 10 minutes that I would give up on the bag and get to my family. I moved to the side and walked past a huge queue, only to find that the area where the bags were being given out was quite free of people. So I got my bag and met up with my family.
I enjoyed the race. I had a great day. But this is far from the best 10K in the UK. Far, far from it. All the little niggles came together at the end and amount to some really poor organisation that needs addressing.
This race could do with a race director who has an interest in running and in making the experience pleasurable for everyone.
I don't write letters of complaint, but feel I may do so on this occasion because people deserve better than the mess at the end of this race. Date of review: September 21, 2008
In short: Tough but likeable In full: Weather plays a large part in one's enjoyment of a race, and the weather conditions on Sunday were not bad, but it was a slightly damp, slightly windy sort of day that diminished the spirits somewhat, and reduced the amount of people out and about who normally give the runners a smile and a wave.
I like this race - I never do well here, and the start is always a bit haphazard, but the marshalls are friendly, the course is attractive, and the race is good value. The change in the course was good - I heard it was because of water works in th estate, but whatever the reason, it would be worth keeping the course change in for future years as it's better to run along the coast than through a housing estate.
If possible, more directions and firm guidance at the start would be helpful. The new start location had similar problems to the previous location in that people were walking up to the start only to find they had to turn around! The tannoy van was parked on the start path so people spilled out around it - partly to hear what was being said, and partly to avoid running into it!
The crisps were a good idea - salt is needed to help stabilise blood pressure. More long distance run organisers are giving out salty snacks these days, which is very positive.
In short: Attractive race In full: Very nice race through attractive countryside. The hills near the end are quite stiff, but what goes up must come down, and the long downhill to the finish is great fun.
There's a relaxed, low key feel to the whole event, a very small field, and encouraging and friendly marshals.
The entry fee includes access to the Mount Ephriam grounds for the whole family, so that's a big bonus. The maze is worth trying!
Be aware that there is little in the way of goodies and no medal. I got a bag printed with the name of the sponsor - but the printing had mostly worn off by the time we got home.
The Red Lion nearby - which you pass near the start - is a decent pub on a chocolate box village green!
Normally I do Cliffe Woods 10K on this date, but will switch to Mount Ephraim from now on. Date of review: August 22, 2008
In short: Poor organisation In full: The weather conditions were a challenge, however, the lack of road signs, the decisions on the day (putting out mile markers - changing 3k to 5K), and the poor commentary were inexcusable. An organisation is measured by how they cope with problems, and this one didn't do well. I have listened to the organiser's explanations on the forum, but felt that some of the criticisms were not properly addressed. Date of review: July 21, 2008