Latest Ratings
| 31 to 40 of 70 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
2005 Bolton 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised again. In full: Not a PB course due to the hills and the (bit of a) wind made it even less likely.
Well organised again. It would have been nice if the tee-shirt had the year on it. Date of review: April 17, 2005
|
2005 Lancaster Three Bridges 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Could be a pb course, except for..... In full: those steps. For me they completely threw any rhythm that I had built up.
That said, well run and marshalled. A definite for next year.
Hopefully we WILL get the t-shirts sent on to us. Date of review: April 10, 2005
|
2005 City of Lincoln 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Yes the toilets!! In full: Overall it was well organised and it would be difficult to fault the marshals and police for making the actual race run well.
However three things let it down, 1) those toilets - not for the faint hearted. 2) the first water station was just as you came around a sharp corner with, as far as I could see no notice of it - was there really only one table there? I wasn't sure as I was on the wrong side of the road and so missed it. I was though glad of the second water station, for this one I luckily was on the right side of the road. 3) the kilometre markers - one or two were nowhere near correct. Date of review: April 3, 2005
|
2005 Southport Good Friday 4
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Another success for Southport and Waterloo In full: Well run and marshalled.
A flat course which could be a PB.
Nice momento. Date of review: March 25, 2005
|
2005 Stanley Park 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Possibly a PB course, bit windy. Date of review: March 13, 2005
|
2005 Ultrafit St Annes 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 5 miles with wind behind then 5 miles wind against In full: I found it a struggle running the second five miles with the wind against and little respite. Hardly the organisers fault though!
Well marshalled and run mostly with a sea-view Date of review: March 6, 2005
|
2005 Lostock 6
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: More hilly than I expected, otherwise enjoyable. In full: Who was it decided to put that hill just after the 4 mile mark? Cruel!
Well worth doing though and overall an enyoable race. Date of review: February 27, 2005
|
2005 Winter Warmer 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hilly race - well worth the trip. In full: I think they took pity on us at the start as we did not have to do that hill in one go, there was a diversion around a flat part to get your breath back.
Certainly challenging with even the small slope near the end seeming like a hill. Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 Garstang 10k
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good race overall In full: Second year I've done this and second year with everyone lining up before being told to move back. A simple sign with 'START'on it would remove the necessity for this shuffling.
Above a tiny complaint as otherwise race well organised. Date of review: January 9, 2005
|
2004 Longridge 7
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I echo what Flatters has already said. In full: I even found some of the slight downward slopes between the hills a struggle, never gave me time to recover.
And I certainly agree about the strobing effect on the sun through the fence, I was glad when that ended. Date of review: December 19, 2004
|

| |