Latest Ratings
| 41 to 47 of 47 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2006 Market Drayton Carnival 10k
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great race, good course, super goody bag. In full: What a goody bag, ok I'd heard it was good but that is an understatement, no wonder 600 people turned up for it this year.
The hills early on are not that bad.
On a personal note I got the pb, happy, but just missed the 6 minute average mile barrier, sad.
Overall super. Date of review: May 14, 2006
|
2006 Christleton 5K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent fast 5k race. In full: one and a half flat laps on country lanes, can't fault it. Date of review: May 12, 2006
|
2006 Bolton 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice race, I should've been at FLM but have been injured this was much more fun.. In full: Good race, nice course, the hill just after 6k did for my target time tho, 9km marker a little out I think, but still happy with performance and everything else. Date of review: April 23, 2006
|
2005 Air Products 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: |
In short: I am complaining now. The results are wrong, it hasn't ruin my life or anything but it's just bad. (2006) Date of review: April 16, 2006
|
2006 Air Products 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: absolutely nothing to complain about. Date of review: April 16, 2006
|
2005 Cheddleton Christmas Pudding 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good race, tough course, but defo worth doing. In full: I skimped on the quality this week so I was looking for a nice race to end the week on and this was the nearest to home. I got there early and drove round the course once and wasn't convinced it was that tough. There were no mile/km markers on the course so I was aiming at doing each of the three laps in 12:50 (38:30) but it wasn't long into it that I realised that the hills I'd driven up where far harder to run up than I'd thought, after going through the first lap in 13:15 I knew I wasn't going to get as good a time as I'd hoped for, but still thought a sub 40 was on the cards. The second lap was so much harder than the first and I struggled round in 13.50. On to the 3rd lap and I got my second wind and felt a lot more relaxed and was abled to work up the hills. The finish is the steepest part of the course and I took it easy on the first 2 times, but for the last descent I threw caution to the wind and careered down the hill in to the finish nearly losing it a couple of times. Finishing in 40.25 I have to say I was disapointed with my effort but can't fault the race it's self. A tough course but traffic free, well marshalled and with excellent support. Organisation was good and the Christmas pud for the finishers was much bigger than I'd expected. Overall a great race! Recommended! Date of review: November 26, 2005
|
2004 Stockport 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: tough but good course Date of review: December 22, 2004
|

| |