Latest Ratings
| 41 to 47 of 47 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
2007 Frank Harmer Memorial 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: well organized, decent sized field. In full: Not a bad venue though I prefer it at Brockwell Park. I understand that this was not an option due to work on the lido. Would have prefered a medal to a t-shirt. Date of review: March 5, 2007
|
2007 Sussex Beacon Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: positives- Flatish 1 lap course, good support, goody bag, bananas Negatives - lack of toilets, Date of review: February 21, 2007
|
2006 Run London - Nike 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great Advert For 10ks In full: You have to take your hat to Nike for what was a very well run event. For a race of this size they did a great job. I was very reluctant to enter as races on this scle have a tendency to be a bit shambolic. The online tracking on training run and the pre race comunication was very good. Also post race information on the website was innovative. You could access your splits plus see a video of yourself stumbling over the line. I suppose you could be cynical and say for £25 you'd expect a few bells and whistles. On the negative side they did nothing to split faster runners from the fun runners at the start so a fast time was hard to achieve. Great atmosphere and a good day out. Date of review: October 9, 2006
|
2006 London Pride Run 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good buzz about it .... nice flat course ..... Date of review: August 19, 2006
|
2006 Barts and the London Charity 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Positive - Very well organized, not oversubscribed and a flat course. Negative - 3 laps but you are restricted by the size if victoria park Date of review: July 16, 2006
|
2006 Regent's Park Summer 10K Series
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: good park run, very well organized and free bananas In full: Plus points - no traffic, potentially quick time though hot day put paid to that, well organized and friendly Negative - markers in miles, laps Date of review: July 4, 2006
|
2006 Orpington 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: tough multi terrain race with relaxed atmosphere Date of review: July 3, 2006
|

| |