In short: I thought it was great ! In full: Firstly,I thought the organisation was exceptional.The air cadets were superb:well spaced,attentive water stations and they were coming round at the finish and topping up our cups and handing out jaffa cakes.The venue was top class too.Great facilities,loads of parking and very easy to get to.I was impressed by the on-screen interim results at the finish-first time I've seen that done.
The rolling start was interesting,although it seemed that most runners went off early.By the time I set off,at 9.25,I think I was one of the last 3 starters.The only real problem I had was in the early part of the return section on the A20.The path was very narrow there and the verge very rough and rutted,so I had to run on the A20 at times to overtake.However,the rest of the route was no problem.
The memento was nothing special,but much more importantly it was an excellent,very well organised race that I hope becomes a regular fixture. Date of review: March 22, 2009
In short: Good race despite the weather In full: We were unlucky with the weather-probably the worst morning for several months,especially the strong wind.
However,the race was as good as ever and the organisers had sorted a couple of "negatives" from previous years-parking near the race HQ and the no. of toilets.
Special thanks to the marshalls,especially those in the most exposed parts of the course.You did a great job and kept cheerful and supportive to us all,despite the cold and rain. Date of review: January 31, 2009
In short: Still one of the best 10K's around In full: This is still a very good 10K with a quick,challenging course and excellent organisation.
It's definitely good for a negative split:invariably,the first 5K takes me 1-1/2 minutes longer than the second,although overall,the course was a little slower this year due to the off-road final kilo.
The section between around 6 and 8K is a little "hairy" due to the proximity of fast traffic,but overall it's an excellent course for a 10K.
Only real criticism is that it needs more toilets at the start.
It's taken "stick" for being expensive,but that's rather unfair as it's good value if you enter in advance and unfortunately,the cost and difficulty of putting on an urban race are getting higher every year. Date of review: October 26, 2008
In short: A very good,no-frills race. In full: Sad to hear it's future is in jeopardy,as I'll certainly miss it if it goes.
It's a great Autumn half:no frills-just a varied,challenging race that offers something to runners of all standards.
The course starts and finishes in the suburbs of Maidstone,but the scenery along the Pilgrim's Way is great and there was plenty of appreciative crowd support and friendly marshalls and water stations etc.
Minor negatives:the "goody bag" was a bit of a misnomer and more importantly,the finish was "sloppy" and needs to be much better marked.It was very hard to tell where the line was and I saw several people stop running before they'd reached it.
At heart,it's a good,old fashioned club race and God forbid that these kind of races disappear and all we're left with is the hideous "Nike Run London" type of commercial operation. Date of review: October 19, 2008
In short: Must now be the best half in Kent In full: So much about this race is top class:fantastic views over the sea,top class marshalling,great goody bag,great PA at the end,excellent and growing crowd support,"interesting" course.
It was decidedly warm today,which made the last few miles very hard-and that hill is an absolute killer.When you reach the top,there's another mile or so of "gentle" incline which really finished me off today !
Agree with the only 2 points for improvement-a race of this size needs more toilets and the 1st water station-especially on a day like today-needs to come earlier.
However,taken overall,it's a "cracking" half marathon. Date of review: September 28, 2008