In short: Straight forward 10k race In full: My third time at Shinfield, and once again it went smoothly with no dramas, and for the third time I broke my PB. The field at the end was a bit boggy, and the unmade road just after the start was a bit iffy with the parked car right on the corner and the water-filled potholes, but they aren't exactly things that the organisers have much control over. All-in-all it's a simple unpretentious 10k race that does exactly what it says on the tin. Thank you Reading Roadrunners for another good event. Date of review: May 5, 2008
In short: Amazing from start to finish In full: My first marathon after several injury-aborted attempts, and what a day. The organisation is quite simply amazing - everything was easy, everything was where you expected it, and it all went so smoothly. All in all it was a remarkably drama-free day, and I'm struggling to even think of any constructive criticism, let alone any negatives. I wish that all races were this well organised. And to cap it all I beat my 3:30 target. A very happy customer :) Date of review: April 17, 2008
In short: Well organised event in excellent location In full: Despite the weather forecast, conditions were pretty good with sunshine for much of the race and the wind wasn't that bad (except for mile 9!). Nice venue with proper car parks and and easy to get to. A minor delay at the start due to late arrivals didn't really cause any problems, and the course itself was fine and well marshalled despite the couple of drivers who seemed determined to ignore the fact 100's of runners were running up narrow lanes. Hope the guy who collapsed and was taken away in the air ambulance is ok. Date of review: March 21, 2008
In short: Well organised and ideal for London Marathoners In full: The map sent out with the numbers was too blurred to read street names, but thankfully there were enough runners around to find the way. Obviously the heavy rain had played havoc with the start/finish area, but the baggage tent was well organised and a welcome shelter from the rain. The path to the start line though was a bit of a shambles, and I would imagine meant many people were late arriving. The army cadets did their best to provide a bridge over the swamp, but it was a little late. Beyond that though the course was undulating enough to keep you honest, and the marshalls did a great job to keep it running like clockwork. The goodie bag was a little thin - feel sorry for whoever had to stuff them. Pity about the wind in the last 2 miles that meant I just missed out going sub 1:30, but that's my own fault for not going a little faster earlier isn't it. Will I do it again - almost certainly. Date of review: March 16, 2008
In short: Another excellent Wokingham Half Marathon In full: This is an excellent race, with traffic free running in very pleasant countryside, good marshalls and great organisation. But then I ran a massive PB, so I would say that wouldn't I :)
BTW I believe your chip time is taken as you cross under the wire strung over the finish line, not when they scan you with the wands. You hear the machine bleep as you cross the line. As for the cost - do you have any idea how much it costs to close 13 miles of public roads, hire toilets for 2000 people etc? I think a few people should try and put on a race, then they'd understand why big races like this cost what they do. Date of review: February 10, 2008
In short: Another well organised race In full: 4th time in this race and was as good as ever. An easy journey by train to the start & got there early enough to avoid the major queues for toilets and bags. Course enthusiastically marshalled as always, but the towpath up to Richmond Bridge seemed rougher this year, or maybe I was just more tired than usual at that point. Two constructive comments however: 1. The pub and the available toilets are getting a little stretched for a 2000 entry race. 2. The start - we lined up behind the barrier in the side street as instructed, but hundreds of people pushed in at the front when they started to walk us forward to the start line. As a result the first couple of miles were an obstacle course trying to get round people who really should have been further back. There didn't appear to be any attempt this year to ask slower runners to start further back.
And a request to people who insist on running races whilst listening to music - please have the volume low enough so you can actually hear your fellow runners when they come to pass you. That way you're less likely to run them into a bollard!
In short: As good as always In full: The fact that this race has been running for years and regularly sells out says it all really. Good organisation, good atmosphere, good spirit and a good route - couldn't ask for more really. And I got a a PB by 30 seconds this time - perfect :) Date of review: August 1, 2007
In short: Good organisation In full: The organisation was excellent and the mass 'cavalry charge' start quite exciting. Sadly my shin only lasted to about 3k so I can't comment on the rest of the course as I had to stop and walk back. Date of review: June 10, 2007
In short: Great surroundings, great race In full: Pity about the heat spoiling my time, but this was an almost perfect race. The organisation was excellent, the views out over the plain absolutely spectacular, and where else do you get to race wallabies and rhinos? Great for families, and race entry even saved on the regular price of zoo admission. Well done Dunstable Road Runners. Date of review: June 4, 2007
In short: Good Course, Good Organisation, Good Race In full: Third time I've done this since its reinstatement, and this was the smoothest so far. Apart from the bottleneck after about 100 yards which they can do nothing about short of moving the start onto a main road (or running the course backwards perhaps), this is an excellent course and the organisation and marshalling first class. No complaints at all, except missing my PB by 4 seconds because it was so hot! I'll be back - hopefully we'll get a cool one next year. Date of review: May 21, 2007