Latest Ratings
| 61 to 70 of 79 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
2007 Woodhall Spa 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Scorching! In full: Well organised friendly race. Just got burnt to a crisp! Can we have some bins at the start? I had to walk 1/2 mile back to the car to dump a water bottle!
Great day, see you next year! Date of review: June 4, 2007
|
2007 City of Lincoln 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Expensive but good In full: The race was a gem, organisation excellent and the atmosphere very good. But why they have to charge so much I'm not sure. Maybe because it's the Council? Date of review: March 25, 2007
|
2007 The Sleaford 1/2M
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great day out In full: Well organised, and no worries with the slippery muddy cross country section. The mile markers at 1 and 2 were 300 or more yards short, but not a huge concern. The new finish line was good too. Thanks to Vicky and Jo who kept me going! Date of review: February 26, 2007
|
2006 Bolsover 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: It was great, now I'm not so sure In full: I'd hate to admit it, but it wasn't as good as last year! The start was rather wobbly as you have to walk through the field to get to the back, so I started much closer o the front than I wanted. Marshalls were great, as they always are, but only 1 cup of "off" water was a bit mean. Date of review: December 19, 2006
|
2006 Clowne Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A good race, just a bit breezy! In full: Can't fault it really, except maybe that the website appeared to advertise a 10:30 start when it was 10 o'clock. Oops. It just meant that my garmin didn't have a fix for the first half mile. Otherwise, good organisation, friendly marshalls and a good finish line. Cheers! Date of review: November 26, 2006
|
2006 Newark Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Wet and fast. Just how like them! In full: Despit being held for a while in a torrent of rain, not bad at all. Crowds were very thin on the ground, though I'd be watching from indoors too! Excellent support from the police and marsalls, thanks for getting wet! Date of review: August 14, 2006
|
2006 Humber Bridge Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A bridge too far? In full: Not a bad run, but it was a bit dreary. Very warm, and water stops weren't too well organised. Very scenic over the bridge (especially if you like brown water!), and generally a pleasant day. Date of review: June 26, 2006
|
2006 Lipton Ice Tea Marathon Challenge
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Wow! That was fun! In full: Well organised, perhaps lacking in signs (I nearly got lost in the woods!) but very good. It was a bit hard to drag myself round a second lap, really did not want to run past the finish line at 6 1/2 miles! Very friendly marshalls, and I was most impressed to see water as often. The pasta and salad at the finish were an excellent idea too! Date of review: June 19, 2006
|
2006 Woodhall Spa 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Glorious, shame about the finish In full: I really wanted to sing Woodhall's praises, but was let down by a very poorly organised finish area. Rather than a 1/2 mile straight to the finish, beyond a sign that said "finish" (may have been an arrow?!) was a 15 yard turn off to the gantry. Unfortunately due to overcrowding and medals ON THE LINE?!!!!!! I had to stop before the line, thus getting a 2 minute variance on times. As a regular runner, I wasn't happy; some of the first timers I saw seemed to be upset. Date of review: June 5, 2006
|

| |