In short: Bumpy with hills, cluttered start In full: Pros: scenic rural hilly course that really tests you with no sustained periods on the flat. Out of town. Nice marshals. Decent technical t-shirt.
Cons: parking (plan it well before arriving as you will have a walk), therefore numbers really should be posted. Very cluttered start in the park and for some time after, No water until mile 5. Traffic on roads in places. Naff medal.
I really enjoyed the course with the undulations. Reminded me a lot of St Albans half (large park cluttered start, rural course crossing motorway and lots of hills). Number collection was easy (but who wants to do it). The course is better than the flattish roadies. Date of review: February 2, 2015
In short: Excellent well-organised event and speedy circuit In full: Still a favourite. Great organisation. Decent food stalls at end. Love the course. A few small hills in the first half. Fast last 5m. Decent support. Date of review: May 19, 2014
In short: Great off-roader, fast second half In full: A great low-key event mixing walkers (earlier set-off) and runners starting at the Avebury Stone circle and finishing at Stonehenge. First half is hilly, challenging and scenic. Second half is fast across the plains on hard track so negative split likely. The finish has moved which is fine except for the road crossing right at the finish. I didn't like that much. Water stations galore. Friendly marshals. A great last few miles when you see the henge in front of you. Date of review: May 6, 2014
In short: Great weather, improved course In full: The Fleet Half Marathon course has changed more than any other race I've known over the years. I think at last, the current one is the best. The start in Reading Rd North is vastly better than the old Leawood Road/Merivale mess. The number of right-angled turns in quick succession is better (although still more than any other HM I've run I think). It's still cluttered for the first mile but it's much, much better. Doing Fleet High Street twice was great for crowd support and it meant half the race was run before you left the town.
Rural support was good (especially by the pubs)
Drink stations were cluttered made worse by the heat. Still need tables on both sides of road where there is full closures.
Support was excellent. As was organisation.
But my run was dreadful (my fault) as was the tuppenny medal at the end.
Continues to be an excellent event. Date of review: March 17, 2014
In short: Excellent event again In full: Great location, great organisation. Continues to be an excellent event. Good for newcomers to off-road events as no really muddy soft-under-foot areas. Good hard-packed paths. Decent challenging hills but also numerous fast sections. Plenty of parking, toilets and showers. Date of review: February 24, 2014
In short: Has it been raining?! In full: This has always been a great little event. Hills, tracks, fields, stone, styals, electric fences, scenery, cakes all make the 21 miles very varied and challenging. This year, the preceding rain (which didn't fall at all during the race) and wind made for some testing areas. Flooded fields, deep slippery mud for some 'ice skating', stone paths turned into rivers with mystery depth puddle. All great fun. I wonder how some of the runners coped who at the start brought the narrow track to a standstill as they attempted to dodge some little muddy area! Had expected this one to get cancelled but happily it wasn't. Very good event. Date of review: February 13, 2014
In short: Continues to be brilliantly organised and a fantastic tough course! In full: Try this one if you love big steep hills, mud, more mud, steeper hills and cake! The fun was further added to this year with the road we started on actually being more like a river. Always good to have ice cold feet from the first mile! This is a great event in a great location. Date of review: January 13, 2014
In short: Does what it says on the tin. Great fun In full: Well organised event based on a farm. Parked just fine. Decent race HQ and registration. Briefing excellent. The course is a mix of country road and trails. The first couple of miles on the road were treacherous in places due to the frost leaving us skating at times. It was a pleasure to hit the mud by the Roman ruins. It was quite heaving going in places with a few hills to test muscles but nothing too tough. Friendly atmosphere. Perfect way to shake off some of the Xmas excess. Mince pies and mulled wine at end nice touch. Decent medal with personal race time plate being posted afterwards is good too. Date of review: January 3, 2014
In short: Breathtaking views, destroying hills In full: I knew this would be a killer when I saw it started at the Lulworth Cove car park and headed straight up the hill path to Durdle Door; that was always a toughie to walk up. Turns out that was was one of the mildest hills. This may be the most extreme hill run I have done (comparable to CTS Exmoor anyway). The hills are huge, steep and potentially slippery - we were lucky it stayed clear and dry most of the time. Some coastal path stone steps to hurt the knees and a styal right near the end to bring on the cramp. Many of the hills you can't run up or down. Many go on for ever. In true Endurance Life style, the half marathon was a painful 16m but this was well advertised.
But the views! Stunning coastal views: Durdle Door, Lulworth Cove, Tyneham village on the ranges, views of Weymouth and Portland.
Endurance Life have got this well worked out now. Great event, well organised but comes at a price. Date of review: January 3, 2014
In short: Excellent course and organisation. Some tough hills. In full: The sun was out at last! Big bonus for this excellent event. Praise for the race HQ, parking, organisation, marshals and the excellent testing and varied course. Open fields, woods, steep hills, gradual hills, track, tarmac, dirt. Over 2000 feet of climb on the 20m lap. I found it all pretty hard work this time around - so tough, I quit after lap 1! Can't fault any aspect of this one. Great value considering the t-shirt inclusion as well. Date of review: April 8, 2013