Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 11 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2011 The Terminator 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent but we still need a ditch the ditch protest group. In full: As usual this race was excellent with a great route, great organization and friendly encouraging marshals. However, please think seriously about chucking out the ditch. I heard lots of complaints about the muck and smell but that didn't bother me - it is just not that sort of gimmicky race - I don't do the sodbury slog for the same reason. Terminator is a great hard cross country race not a wading competition. Anyway, ditch aside, thanks for the race PVRC and keep up the good work. Date of review: March 2, 2011
|
2010 The Terminator 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Gurt Lush...conditions even too tough for the Terminator to make an appearance this year ! In full: It's the beauty (with regards to scenery and organisation) of this complete cross country test that reminds me why I could do this sort of event every week and never bother with a road race again. By the way, did they ship in extra mud this year ? Not sure I've ever seen so much on the route. Oh, and I hope the guy who did a face plant in the bog has wrestled his way out by now. Date of review: February 28, 2010
|
2009 Slaughterford 9
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Muddy - I felt I ran quite well but definitely my slowest time. In full: I'm looking forward to the results so I can see if I really ran as badly as my time suggests but the other reviews so far have backed up my opinion that it was a muddy one this year. Enjoyable as ever and well organised by runners for runners.Thanks Chippenham H. Date of review: January 25, 2009
|
2008 King Alfred's Torment 7
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A perfect race on a perfect day. One of my top 5 races every year. In full: Each year I shake my head in wonder as only a few souls run around this wonderful course when only the week before thousands upon thousands pounded the streets of Bristol. I can only assume this is a race for those who have fully converted to the religion of running. Ah well, their loss is definitely my gain. Such a great day just makes the working week longer ! Date of review: September 22, 2008
|
2008 The Terminator 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great...but too dry this year. In full: Great race as always but unfortunately it was much too dry underfoot this year...compared to last year it felt like a 10k road race. I thought the stampeeding horses coming out of the gate by the coombe were a nice touch - they were definitely the toughest obstacle I've ever faced in a race. Date of review: February 25, 2008
|
2007 Dursley Dozen
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: An thoroughly enjoyable hilly trail race, with a bit of road to complicate your shoe choice and a very steep muddy hill (with rope to help you up) near the end to ensure you finish with a warm glow. Date of review: February 14, 2007
|
2005 King Alfred's Torment
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good all round test. Second favourite race of 2005. Date of review: August 9, 2006
|
2006 Keevil Airfield 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Too hot this year but a great family friendly event. In full: Really should be PB material but the heat made it feel like a death march for me. A great one for the family though, as they really enjoyed the helicopter, kites and childrens races. Lots of room to picnic too. Thanks to all involved. Date of review: June 5, 2006
|
2006 Pewsey Vale 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not completely flat but still a surprisingly quick course. In full: A small, well organised race from the always hard working & friendly Pewsey RC. Date of review: April 10, 2006
|
2006 The Terminator 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fine example of why cross country beats road running. In full: Excellent race organised by runners for runners - well done Pewsey RC yet again. Just 2 suggestions 1/ Run 1 or maybe 2 of the hills at a slight angle so that with great effort they would be just about runable. 2/ Take out stile at top of 1 of the hills - I hear some runners had to queue for 5 minutes. Date of review: February 27, 2006
|

| |