Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 22 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
2009 Victory 5
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: September and no wind Date of review: September 20, 2009
|
2008 Winchester 10K - Race for AAIR
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Challenging but fair course. In full: Good race. Start could do with some segregation by projected finish time to help ease the congestion. Date of review: June 9, 2008
|
2008 Yateley Road Race Series
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great mid week race In full: 6th one of these races I've done and the organisation and marshalling were upto there superb standards. New start worked OK except for the bottleneck at the gate. Date of review: June 9, 2008
|
2007 New Forest 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, good marshalling, challenging course. In full: Felt the changes to the course this year improved it, first time for me with new start time which also was an improvement. Hot but nothing like 2004 and 2005. Whole race organisation makes it well worth adding to your race calendar Date of review: July 8, 2007
|
2007 Totton 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well marshalled, fast course Date of review: April 18, 2007
|
2006 2006 Yateley 10K Road Race Series Race 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised, a course to keep everyone interested Date of review: August 3, 2006
|
2006 Brading 10k
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Heat and hills made it tough but well organised and marshalled. Date of review: June 19, 2006
|
2006 Bognor Prom 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Despite wind and rain organisation good,marsalling good and excellent support. In full: Shame about the weather which made the second half quite hard. Considering the weather the support out on the course was truely amazing. Date of review: May 21, 2006
|
2006 Alton 10
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A challenging course, certainly undulating but not impossibly so. Date of review: May 17, 2006
|
2006 Totton 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised, well supported in residential area. Fast course. Date of review: April 2, 2006
|

| |