Latest Ratings
| 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
2010 Royal Parks Foundation Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Loved the race. A truly great experience! In full: Organisation is the best there is. You cannot fault it. The start was fab and it was despite the amount of runners, there was enough space for everyone. The sun shone too, which always helps. Would certainly make the effort to enter again in 2011. Date of review: October 10, 2010
|
2010 Clavering 5K and 10K Fun Run
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A great race. Organisation was excellent. More like cross country with stiles and bridges to cross and very muddy in places In full: No real PB potential due to the terrain. Very muddy as a result of the rain yesterday. Was surprised to see steps, bridges, stiles and very lanes. Difficult to get into a rhythm. Only marshall on the track to give any encouragement was at 4k. Lots of cheers at the end so made up for it! Local race so will probably do it again knowing what is in store next time! Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2009 Candleford Canter Ladies Only 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great race. Really enjoyed it. Superb organisation In full: Really enjoyed today. Travelled over 60 miles to get there and it was well worth it. Got my PB for 10k. There were some hills - but nothing too long or steep. Great down hill between 8 and 9k to stretch the legs out! I will certainly look to do it again. Many thanks. Date of review: October 25, 2009
|

| |