Latest Ratings
| 1 to 5 of 5 ratings | Page: 1 |
2009 Reading Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Best 1/2 in the UK In full: Forget Bath! Date of review: March 31, 2009
|
2009 Bath Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poor organisation at start and end In full: No excuse for not starting on time - an extra 30 minutes standing around was not required! Shambles at the end. Too many people for the venue. 3 hour drive each way to get there and £40 of fuel was not worth it. Date of review: March 15, 2009
|
2007 Luton Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised and a real marathon challenge In full: The marshals deserve the medals - 5plus hours in the cold, wet, wind - well done. This was the 12th marathon I've done and by far the biggest test. Hilly and poor weather conditions. Well done, again, to the marshalls. Date of review: December 2, 2007
|
2005 BUPA Great North Run
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good day out but people need to be more realistic about their ability Date of review: September 19, 2005
|
2005 British 10K
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poor value for money and badly organised In full: No promised goody pack, poor t-shirt - faded when washed. Start OK but I didn't realise I'd finished! No clear finish line. Chaotic. Too many runners - plus those out of puff walked in the middle of narrow roads so hard to pass. Not enouth water at end. Should have been really good but I won't be back. Date of review: July 4, 2005
|

| |