Latest Ratings
| 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
2011 Cardiff Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: New is not always better In full: START - like a circus - 1:5 ratio of toilet, ended up starting the race with a stomach full of water as the queue would have taken me longer to get into than running the actual race also why make it twisty and turny, its not a grand prix, use lloyd george ave for the straight it you want to make up distance ROUTE - not flat like before, but slightly undulating
SCENERY - miss the bute park/sophia gardens -especially when its replaced by DUAL CAIRRAGEWAY
Date of review: October 17, 2011
|
2007 San Domenico 20
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: a mix of flat and straights Date of review: April 1, 2007
|
2006 Kymin Dash
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: What goes up... : ) In full: it was a very hard...but good run, even if you classed this a training run, you would get the benefit of the 3 1/2 mile mountain. It just keeps on going, up, and up, and up!!! get the point!! a few water station as you reach each level of the mountain! Something a mashal said made me laugh as I reached the top (exhausted) he said youve got the hard bit now...referring to the down hill section, I thought to myself..what a cock! :) But actually he was kinda right, a tip from me is to just leave your arms flop coming down the other side, otherwise you just slow yourself down!! See you next year!!! 11th this time..who knows next time!?? Date of review: August 3, 2006
|
2006 Shakespeare Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: a few little inclines...yeah right!! In full: I managed to get a new Half PB (-1:30) in the race from doing it last year, but there are things which the race lacks - bottled water all the time, instead of cups (running and drinking a cup of water is so hard!!!) bottled water is far easy going! And one steward was particularly sarcastic when I reached 12miles - and commented - only 10 more to go!! Not funny! sorry about the ranting, but after not getting a t-shirt and paying a rather respectable entry fee I do not believe it is worth it! Date of review: May 7, 2006
|
2006 Great Welsh Run 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very fast race with every potential to get a good PB. At the start it is difficult to get out of the "herd" (unless your at the front) but apart from that very welcoming Date of review: May 1, 2006
|
2005 GRIM 8
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: If I got a t-shirt In full: Compared to Races such as the London 1/2 Marathon, which gives you a t-shirt, a medal and other goodies, this race really let me down. Date of review: December 9, 2005
|
2004 Aberystwyth 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: information regarding contact information and other things could have been dealt with more effectiveley Date of review: December 12, 2004
|

| |