Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 13 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2006 Mizuno Liverpool Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Couldn't fault it In full: Seriously, can't think of anything they could have done better for me. My first half, and probably the best organised race I've done, considering the scale of it. Great course (even the much-dreaded hill was easier than I expected) and support all the way, good water and lucozade stations (and bottles/pouches are much better than plastic cups), organisation around start and finish was great (I'm glad they cut the chip off as I couldn't reach my feet by that point). The clocks on the mile markers were a nice touch, and I actually now own a race T-shirt that fits me, never usually get XL t-shirts at all. And a nice goody bag with a nice chunky medal. Nope, still can't think of a complaint. Date of review: March 20, 2006
|
2006 Standish Hall Winter Trail Race
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: still a tough but excellent race In full: everything I said last year still applies, but I'm a bit quicker now, so not quite so close to last place this time. Will be back again next time too - could definitely go faster Date of review: February 18, 2006
|
2006 Hit The Trail 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: yep, still well worth getting out of bed for In full: Great fun, the mud was still there, but there seemed to be more hills than I remembered - might have just blanked them out. First mile is still all uphill, and the continuing lack of mile markers meant that once the garmin went mental under the trees I struggled a bit with my pacing - still took almost five minutes off last year's time. I also forgot that you can't see the finish from the bottom (literally, its a hill) of the finish straight, its just round the corner at the top, so it can be tricky to pace yourself up there. Great marshalls too. The general lack of races in january makes this one stand out but I'd do it whatever month it was. Will be back next year, I'll be after another five minutes off the time. Date of review: January 15, 2006
|
2005 Ribble Valley 10k
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Fantastic race, rubbish finish In full: Great location and scenery, generally well-organised, marshalls did a great job of controlling the cars and a nice relaxed atmosphere. Calling it flat/undulating is a bit cheeky, I can't remember any bits of it that were flat for any distance, it was up or down the whole way. Quite often I got to what I thought must be the top and I thought it would be downhill from there, only to see the next uphill around the corner. Beat my PB and my target for the year though. On the downside, the finish was a mess. Having the finish line clearly marked (taking into account the fact that most runners have tunnel vision by that stage in a race) by something as simple as marking a line on the road would make a real difference, at least people would be able to get an accurate time for themselves. And being really picky, could they not have given out the T-shirts in the hall rather than in the doorway which left me queuing in the cold with my knees seizing up and no water for ten minutes. If they can sort out these niggles I'd be happy to come back next year. Date of review: December 30, 2005
|
2005 Santa Dash 5K
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Please get the route and distance right next time In full: Last year it was supposed to be 3.5m and ended up 5K, this year it was supposed to be 5K and turned out to be 3.5m. I know its a fun run, but it would be nice to know how long the race is before you get to 3 miles. All of the other 15 races I have done this year have been the distance they were supposed to be, how hard can it be? Also telling people that the route has changed before they start would be a nice touch. The goody bags were excellent, and it was generally good fun and well organised, but the minor niggles spoiled a fun day. Date of review: December 4, 2005
|
2005 Llandudno 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fantastic. In full: Lovely day, great route (nice hills, great scenery in sections and a pretty town to start off), fantastic support and marshalling and very well organised. Only minor gripe is that some of the mile markers were a bit out. My first 10m, I'd do it again, if not tomorrow, then as soon as my legs and feet have stopped hurting. Thanks to NWRRC for a cracking day. Date of review: November 13, 2005
|
2005 L1310K 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Nice race In full: Everyone else has done the main complaints - bags should have been in the trucks, or at least the signs should have been on top of the tent where people could see them. Can't believe people checked the date on the water, I couldn't even tell you what colour the label was. very good marshalling and marking, the race itself was excellent, its just the fiddly bits that need tightening up for next year. Managed 3 minutes off my PB, but the number of people to dodge meant I think I could go faster still. Date of review: October 9, 2005
|
2004 Santa Dash 5K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Free santa suit - what more do you want? In full: my first race, very enjoyable and 2000 santas in the middle of liverpool is an incredible sight - as we converged on the start, the people wearing normal clothes started to look out of place. And for a good cause. Will definitely do this again in 2005. Date of review: August 23, 2005
|
2005 Sefton Park 5
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: well-organised, nice course, nice night for a race, needed more toilets Date of review: July 21, 2005
|
2005 Myerscough College Croxteth Park 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well-organised, quick, flat, nice goody bag, very good race In full: Only negative was a couple of narrow sections made it hard to get clear of slower runners early on, mostly paths were wide and flat, generally very good. I also remember thinking it would be better if it was run the other way round the course but I can't remember why. Date of review: May 27, 2005
|

| |