Latest Ratings
| 1 to 6 of 6 ratings | Page: 1 |
2006 Wilmslow Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent race - one of the best in the calendar In full: Very enjoyable course. Great support from the crowds. A bit busy at the beginning - maybe spread the start out a bit more. Date of review: March 20, 2006
|
2005 Ellesmere Oswestry 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Nice venue, good course, but had a kick in the tail! In full: The organisation and the venue were very good. A small field with mostly club runners, but friendly. The first 8 miles were great ... then it had a long, uphill slog for the final 2 miles ... glad no one could hear what I was muttering under my breath!! Once I recovered though, the lasting impression was that of an enjoyable event. Many thanks to the hosts. Date of review: May 9, 2005
|
2005 Wilmslow Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Excellent - very enjoyable, good support, well organised In full: This was a really well organised and enjoyable event. However, the pre-race material was a bit OTT if you are a beginner. The organisers clearly wanted to make sure this was viewed as a serious race and not a fun run. That's OK, but it could have been done a bit more tactfully! Date of review: March 29, 2005
|
2004 Stockport 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great run - well organised and friendly Date of review: December 16, 2004
|
2004 Llandudno 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Vert enjoyable, great to run down the prom Date of review: November 22, 2004
|
2004 L1310K Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poor organisation at beginning, end and with results. They do not reply to email or phone messages. In full: Race was a challenging up-hill, on-road slog. But worth the effort. My biggest gripe - they got my chip (and thus time) mixed up. I was photographed by the Liverpool Post crossing the line with the 1st wheelchair runner. His time was 45 minutes - yet they had my time down as 1h18m! Wheelchair runners start before the rest of the field. I have tried to contact them them about this, but they don't return emails or phone calls. Date of review: October 14, 2004
|

| |