Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 12 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2006 Stockport 10
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Too much running up and down pavements. Goody bag and marshals excellent. Date of review: December 10, 2006
|
2006 Virgin London Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: The Best In full: My first ever marathon. What an event. The organisation was superb and the crowds fantastic. If you have never done this race then do! Date of review: April 28, 2006
|
2006 NJT Supplies Ltd Liversedge Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hills everywhere! In full: I thought it may be over distance. My GPS clocked it at 13.25 miles. Date of review: February 16, 2006
|
2006 Woodkirk 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Car parking on a mud bog! The downhill is too severe and I think dangerous. Date of review: January 29, 2006
|
2005 Wolverton 5
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: This race has lots of potential but is seriously let down by organisation In full: This race has serious potential to be excellent - the course is fast, the location wonderful and it's not too big. There are a lot of easy wins for the organisers - have a finish line, offer water at finish, more marshals on the course, organise the start better.
This race has real potential to be a pre-Xmas special. MKAC could make a real name and grow a very profitable race. Date of review: November 27, 2005
|
2005 St Neots Riverside Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Organisation fantastic, quick course and great T shirt. In full: This is a great event. My first time. I've run 5 half marathons this year and this is definitely the best. A very special race. Date of review: November 21, 2005
|
2005 Worksop Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent organisation. Marshalling good and truly traffic free In full: A good race. Weather not excellent but well organised. The start needs sorting out - slower runners arriving late were joining at front. Date of review: October 30, 2005
|
2005 BUPA Great North Run
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Grown too big? In full: The water stations need to be earlier. The first seemed to be around 5 miles. On a hot day this was too late. I think the procong is getting steep and the numbers too many. The atmosphere is great but don't expect a PB Date of review: September 19, 2005
|
2005 City of Manchester 10K
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 20% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Some problems to work on In full: Two major problems. First, the start was delayed and then not delayed and we had to stand in sun for 15mins when called to satrt. Second, the water ran out. Not acceptable. Date of review: June 26, 2005
|
2005 Sheffield Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Great finish at stadium. In full: A nice race. Bit boring on the run into Sheffield and back. Water in cups is crazy. Date of review: May 2, 2005
|

| |