Latest Ratings
| 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
2005 Serpentine New Year's Day 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race - very well organised - and I started the new year with a PB !! Date of review: January 2, 2005
|
2004 Wimborne 10
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A well organised race around the country lanes of Dorset Date of review: December 29, 2004
|
2004 Nike 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great event to be part of but difficult to get a decent time In full: Organisation was generally very good, although the start could have been better (especially when your kept stood around for a long time in the freezing cold in just the yellow Nike shirt !!). And at the finish line it was poorly lit, muddy and poorly marshalled. I would have expected bigger crowds but I guess it was a cold sunday night. Having said that, it was a great event to be a part of and would definitely do it again. Date of review: December 29, 2004
|
2004 Somerley 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Over 10k but an enjoyable race In full: Very scenic and enjoyable race but let down a bit by the start being a bit chaotic, no distance markers or water stations, and no published results.....and it was definitely more than 10k !! Date of review: December 29, 2004
|

| |