Latest Ratings
| 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
2012 Hangover 5
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well run race again, allways starts the year of well. Testing course, well marshalled.
Date of review: January 2, 2012
|
2011 Brighton Marathon 2011
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: HILLY first nine miles, hot day put pay to pb's. But very well run atmosphere better than london.
Date of review: April 15, 2011
|
2010 Hampshire 10K
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In full: With someone who thought they were winning having to do another lap of the track at the end, nearly being tripped up by someone pulling tap across the track, and chalk arrows on the path to follow where short of marshals. I don't think the wide spreed of runners helped the course. Sorry to moan [IT WAS FAST].
Date of review: May 3, 2010
|
2007 ARUNDEL PARK 10K
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hard, undulating,well run race. BEST 10K around. With super views.
Date of review: March 6, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
