My Event Ratings

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		40%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Nice trail run but needed more marshals
In full: Enjoyable trail run (well done to the bare-foot runner!) but there were a couple of places where runners were unsure of the way - people were wandering off onto the wrong trail - so a few more marshals or arrows would be good. Nice race though.
Date of review: October 13, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		20%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Awesome
In full: Fabulous, fabulous, loved the mud, the hills, the mud, the rain, the mud, the puddles and oh, did I mention the mud. Brilliant Portsmouth Joggers, a real stormer
Date of review: February 28, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Absolutely outstanding, my fave run ever
In full: ..even beats the London marathon. Awesome, fantastic, brilliant.
Date of review: November 10, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Fast downhill sections give this course lots of PB potential
Date of review: October 5, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Loved it!
In full: Lovely scenic course, challenging but not sick, great organisation.
Date of review: July 5, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

Date of review: May 17, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Liked the Mayor dude who started the race then ran it himself!
Date of review: March 30, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Loved the hills!
In full: Up-and-down course made for lots of variety. Narrow start, but once the race came out of the town and excellent course. Hard uphills and some great downhills too. Nice one!
Date of review: March 1, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		40%

In short: A hard 20-miler, great FLM warm-up
In full: Hard run, lots of ups and downs added variety, beautiful scenery, hardly any cars. Very challenging 20. Only downside was the waterbottle - no good if it hasn't got a lid you can close!
Date of review: February 23, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Improved course this year
In full: Improved course this year meant the course was more rural with less housing estates than before. PB potential on a cooler day. Liked the earlier start this year. Only critism is that car-parking chaotic, some marshalls preventing more people turning into an already full car-park would be good.
Date of review: July 30, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator