Latest Ratings
| 1 to 2 of 2 ratings | Page: 1 |
2012 Peckham 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Shambolic organization for what could be an awesome local event and good value. In full: Ok, sort out the organization. Could have divided up OTD race numbers into 3 piles and had 3 queues as all they were doing was writing a name down then giving you a number and taking a tenner, simple really. That is why race started late and not because of runners world as said on the day. Great course though and great to over take slower runners on multiple laps. I did PB which was great. I would so do this race again. Thanks Date of review: May 6, 2012
|
2005 Wolverton 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Confusion! ! ! ! !! In full: Great race but organisers had little or no briefing. Would not have liked to be in the defrief! No clear marked finish line, lead bike went wrong way, blue rope at funnel could not be seen from the grass making it dangerous. But a very nice flat super fast course, but will have to pull their finger out to attract returnees. Favourite race scoring is high for the pb potential. Date of review: November 26, 2005
|

| |