Latest Ratings
| 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
2012 Shakespeare Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Poor organisation at the end. In full: We are club runners, with moderate experience, in our mid-sixties, running the half. The organisers were not responsible for the weather, but they were responsible for the very congested last mile which meant overtaking was almost impossible, the lack of bananas and water at the end, the fact we had to seek out our medals and chip removal, the fact that the tea tent was full of non-runners so we could have no warming drink after being out there for 2hrs 20 mins or so. We have great sympathy for the runners who came in after us as the green way was atrocious. We also think the marshalls were valiant. We will never again enter a run organised by non- runners. Date of review: May 1, 2012
|
2011 Adnams Great East Run 20K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lots of good touches, not least the soup Date of review: November 7, 2011
|
2010 Norwich Union Trowse 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Long, graded hill but otherwise a good run. Friendly and well managed. Date of review: April 6, 2010
|

| |