Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 10 ratings | Page: 1 |
2009 Trionium Greensand Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great race, but the term hilly doesn't really do the profile justice! In full: Trionium events are always really well organised and very friendly. The term Trionium is now synonomous with hills and this route certainly lived up to expectations! Certainly not a race for PBs but it was a fantastic day out with beautiful views and a nice bit of singing :-)
Date of review: October 27, 2009
|
2006 New Year Box Hill Knacker Cracker 10k
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastic start to the year :-) Date of review: January 1, 2006
|
2005 Luton Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Undulating course - laps makes it good for supporters.... who could be persuaded to do the relay! Date of review: December 5, 2005
|
2005 New Year Box Hill Knacker Cracker 10k
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastic start to the year :-) Date of review: January 4, 2005
|
2004 Wimbledon 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: nice race but lots of road crossings so need to keep an eye on the traffic. £15 entry fee is steaper than the hill and the "trophy" is a bit odd! Date of review: September 21, 2004
|
2004 The Terminator 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Water stations could be more organised adn my T-shirt is enormous - but the home made cake makes it worth running up those hills Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 GRIM 8
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Not as GRIM as last year but still fun and such glorious weather although a bit chilly - collected a cup of ice at the water station! Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 Woburn 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: The coldest windiest day ever but the marshals and runners all kept smiling. No other race has bisonon route! Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 New Year Box Hill Knacker Cracker 10k
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% |
In short: Fab way to start the year with some really tough hills. You have to be in it for fun and to get a new PW - I added 20 mins to my 10k time! Very friendly :-) Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
2004 Midsummer Munro Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% |
In short: Guarunteed a personal worst for distance but the friendliest race ever - the hardest half but worth the pain! Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |