Latest Ratings
| 1 to 6 of 6 ratings | Page: 1 |
2010 Virgin London Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: First time - incredible crowd, tough weather In full: Crowd was absolutely sensational. The volunteers were excellent. Was a little disappointed with the non-management of the starting pens, though. Didn't feel as euphoric at the end as I might have hoped, but certainly crossed the line with a huge smile. Date of review: April 26, 2010
|
2010 Tunbridge Wells Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Weather couldn't put a dampner on it In full: In spite of tough weather conditions (cold, rained the whole time, a series of deep and long puddles to wade through) and a very challenging middle section this was really well organised and enjoyed. Whole roads (or at least carriageways in one direction) shut off for the runners and amazing support from the locals even out in the sticks. A shame that there's no obvious transport from the train station to the race as turnaround time doesn't allow much prep, but that's barely a complaint. Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2010 Newham 10K
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Cobbled-together feel In full: Organisation of the associated fun day was good but the course was poor, far too tight in places early on for that volume of runners. The route was fairly grim and the Olympic Park section a total let-down. Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2008 Kingston Running Festival Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Better organisation before, great course and great time! In full: Added chip timings this time around which is a big bonus. Thankfully the weather was perfect too. Date of review: October 13, 2008
|
2008 adidas Breakfast Run 16
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyable but not incredibly well organised. Start is cramped and paths are narrow after the first mile or so. Not chip-timed, so lost out on the start. In full: Enjoyable but not incredibly well organised. Start is cramped and paths are narrow after the first mile or so. Not chip-timed, so lost out on the start. Date of review: March 31, 2008
|
2006 BUPA Great South Run
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: First time 10mile for me and exceeded expectations (and target time!), in spite of the rain. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Date of review: October 22, 2006
|

| |