My Event Ratings

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Well done to the whole organising team, excellent
In full: An excellent tour of St Neots, really well organised and marshalls.
Date of review: August 21, 2012

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Fantastic race again from Bedford, well done
In full: This is the 4th race I have entered with Bedford and the 3rd December half marathon and yet again it was fantastic. The course is challenging for all, yet manageable for all and as always it was very well organised and everyone, participants and marshalls were very friendly. I will definately enter more Bedford races. Thanks.
Date of review: December 13, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		40%

In short: Excellent race and great views
Date of review: March 3, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		40%

In short: Excellent race, sign me up for next year :-0. V. well organised
In full: I did this race last year and it was good, even better this year with improved T-shirts as souveignrs and slightly less wind (although still windy on miles 6 through 8). Will definately want to do this race again next year. Tough with the hills at 4 and 9 miles, but beat my last years time by 2.5 mins so will aim for the same again next year :-) Only issues were some irrate drivers that couldn't get out of junctions due to us running past, Marshalls got a bit of an ear bashing from them, but seemed to be handled well.
Date of review: January 20, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Extremely well organised, made up for the wet and cold.
In full: This was an excellently organisered race. The atmosphere and scenery was geat. The rain pouring down at mile 4, got us all soaked through to the skin and cold with the wind, but the Marshalls were fanstic, sticking to their posts even in the wet weather. The number of marshalls on the courses was also fantastic and with 4 water stations! Also the added bonus of jelly babies at the 3rd water station - Thank you :-) The kids singing jingle bells just before the 8 mile marker was also a great pick up, I even managed a wave and a smile for the photographer.
Date of review: December 9, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: poor start and finish set up, hilly and uneven ground
In full: I agree very much with what the last person has written. Good distance and views, but challenging due to the hills and diffcult under foot in most places due to the uneven ground.

Agreed T-shirts are nice, but walk to start and from finish is too long when you've just tackled a hilly 10 miles and it's cold!!! - this needs some serious consideration.

Also no toilets at the start which is a mile walk from HQ!.

It is unlikely I would do this again, mainly due to the walk at the start and finish.

Agreed marshalls were very supportive and huge thanks to you all :-)
Date of review: November 18, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Good race, I got a 10k PB, flat and enouh water
Date of review: July 11, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator