Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 11 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
2009 Crisis Square Mile Run
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Route was longer than advertised - so what?; a rather nice race In full: Not a PB cpurse, but a fun stomp around the city, nice route - maybe a little congested at pinch points but it can be like that of a lunchtime anyway.
Great cause, will do again. My garmin gave 4.21m which is a chunky bit further than the advertised 3.5m! Date of review: June 5, 2009
|
2009 Ashford & District 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely course, good organisation In full: Lovely run on closed roads with beautiful scenery and just the one hill. Will def be repeating, if only for the hilarity in the car park! Date of review: February 9, 2009
|
2009 Reedham Ten
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice route, but so windy, oh so windy! In full: slow but very very comfortable. Windy - oh so windy - sporadic snow but never felt like I couldn't do it. Longest run for a very long time, so very pleased indeed. Forgot my garmin, and enjoyed taking the pressure off a bit. Was undulating but no killer hills. Will def. do again Date of review: February 1, 2009
|
2009 SiS Lakeside Canal Run Frimley
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Puddly! In full: Loved the puddles - really enjoyed plodding round. Looking forward to next year. Trail shoes for that one though. Date of review: January 25, 2009
|
2009 Bushy Park 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Definitely not flat! In full: Really a run over the same hill (undulation?)in Swanley Paek 4 times. Wouldn't have come if I'd realised that - haven't got the mental strength for laps and hills together! Having said that, it was a thump around in the fresh air and a medal for a tenner which I think is pretty good value. Apparently there were last minute changes to the course due to the weather, so maybe it was flat to start with. Date of review: January 11, 2009
|
2009 Wymondham New Year's Day 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very enjoyable - great organisation In full: Everything went remarkably well considering my lac of preperation and the amount of vodka I'd unwisely imbibed the night before. Long but gentle hill and fantastic marshalls - will definitely be back. Date of review: January 1, 2009
|
2008 Dedham Run 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great organisation and atmosphere In full: The hills did for me, but can't use my lack of training to knock anything about the organisation and route. As ever, many thanks to the marshalls Date of review: September 21, 2008
|
2008 Canvey Island Rotary 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Thoroughly enjoyable, lovely marshalls In full: Enjoyed that. Well organised and flat, along the sea wall. Lovely encouragement by the marshalls and the people outside their houses. Will def do again. Date of review: September 7, 2008
|
2008 Great East Run 20K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Perfect organisation, great for a newbie In full: As a slow fat person I was worried when I saw all the club runners, but I stayed at the back and loved every minute.
Absolutely superb race, and consistent 10 min miles for the first 10m, fell off a bit after that. V friendly, parking no probs, great goody bag - def doing again
Suffolk type hills (i.e. laughable for most other parts of the country, mountains to me), then the bulk was dead flat, then a killer hill for the final half mile.
And perfect weather. Fantastic. Oh, and free beer in the goody bag. And soup at the end. And a big BBQ. And a banana.
AND A MEDAL - ARE YOU LISTENING WHOEVER ORGANISED LAST WEEK IN BATTERSEA PARK??!!
Well, if I hadn't already entered I'd be kicking the door down to get into the Bungay Black Dog half marathon in April Date of review: February 17, 2008
|
2008 10K Love Run
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fab weather, disappointing organisation In full: Saved by the weather - no water, no medal, long queue for the bags but very apologetic and pleasant people trying to sort it out. Would probably do it again, but only because the location is handy. For £20 I expect a bit more than this, good cause or not. Date of review: February 11, 2008
|

| |