Latest Ratings
| 1 to 9 of 9 ratings | Page: 1 |
2010 Surrey Spitfire 20
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: organisation needs looking at In full: parking was too far from start/finish line after running 20 miles you don't want to walk 500 yards to get your baggage then walk all the way back passed were you've just come from and walk for another 5 mins to get to your car.not enough toilets meaning a 25 min wait before start of race.plenty of water stations if a half filled cup is all you need and no sign of jelly babies as promised inrace pack.the energy drink was the same small amount at 5 miles and on the second lap at 15 miles they had run out.some runners need extra fluids and when told how often they would be on hand don't take too much of their own could struggle on such a long distance.goody bag was a waste of spacewould have been better off with a party bag as the only thing worth having was the mars bar.on the good side it was a GOOD medal Date of review: March 16, 2010
|
2010 Saucony 10K @ TCR
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: a good undulating run Date of review: February 14, 2010
|
2010 Nonsuch Park 10K Fun Run
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: not bad for a 4 lap race Date of review: February 7, 2010
|
2010 New Year Box Hill Knacker Cracker 10k
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: lives up to its name -knackering In full: seemed harder than last year -especially the steps Date of review: January 1, 2010
|
2009 Saab Salomon Turbo X, Bordon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: worth turning up for In full: bloody mad,bloody hard but bloody good fun Date of review: November 22, 2009
|
2009 New Year Box Hill Knacker Cracker 10k
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very testing Date of review: January 1, 2009
|
2008 Gosport Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: overall worth the trip In full: only problem was three water stations and no energy drink not a lot for a half marathon Date of review: November 16, 2008
|
2008 Asics Fleet Pre-London Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good chance of pb In full: a good route,reasonably flat and quite a good time to start(11.30)i even managed a p.b 1.59.11 knocking 8 minutes of previous p.b which was achieved at Reading 2 weeks ago Date of review: March 16, 2008
|
2008 Fred Hughes 10
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: start and finnish could have been better In full: overall not too bad at the start too many people pushing to the front and not bothered about others already in position, at the end was disapointed that they had run out of water Date of review: January 20, 2008
|

| |