Latest Ratings
| 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
2009 Bideford Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: this used to be my favourite race but not after today's cock up In full: haven't done this race for a couple of years and was really looking forward to it.trying to go sub 80 mins but the first mile split put an end to that.also had to pay over a pound and collect my number/chip and only received it thursday.start was rubbish[why not start on the main road ? ], oh and how much for the car park? criminal.town council must be raking it in !shan't bother next year.but nice tee-shirt !!! Date of review: March 1, 2009
|
2008 Neolithic Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: excellent race [ er run ! ].quads are sore today.must have been a few hills !plenty of water stations and friendly marshals etc.good combination of walkers/runners.i'm glad the walkers were out as it would have been la lonely run for me.congrats to Date of review: May 5, 2008
|
2008 Gloucester Marathon – Epney
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: organisation needs tweaking a bit. In full: felt a definite lack of toilet facilities.where were the toilets at the start.should have opened the memorial hall.could do with mile markers and another water station near last junction.not sure if the out and back start/finish is a good thing but if i'd had a flier then it would have been fantastic ! well done for first time but i won't be rushing back Date of review: January 29, 2008
|

| |