My Event Ratings

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		20%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Trail running at its best
In full: Fantastic event - excellently marshalled, wonderfully well organised. Huge fan of this event. But it is a bit hard!!
Date of review: August 7, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		40%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		40%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		20%

In short: Great route, great atmosphere, shame about the route cock-up in the first mile
In full: Tough old beast, this. Lack of mashalling at 0.8 miles led to confusion and two groups of runners took different routes to mile 1.5. That drama over, it was on to the mud and the trails - great hills, wonderful marshalling the rest of the way, never been to Epping before but will be back - a triumph.
Date of review: March 20, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Great Marshalls - especially the lady at the bottom of the hill!!
Date of review: March 16, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		60%

In short: Ideal speed session pre London Marathon
Date of review: January 18, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		20%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%

In short: The Hills, the hills
In full: Great race - well organised and really hell on the hills.
One very minor moan - any way they could get the faster runners at the front and the slower at the back at the beginning? Maybe by asking for a 10k best time and adding numbers approximately by speed?.
Date of review: November 16, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator