Latest Ratings
| 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
2010 Wokingham Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good race route and organisation Date of review: February 22, 2010
|
2009 46th Hogs Back 8
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great hill at start and nice one at the end too. A worthy challenge for most. In full: A good challenge. Main hill was about 2 miles long, then some steep downhill running. Nice touch at the end with the mile or so uphill again to the finish line. There was a bit of a problem along one stretch of road where there was heavy traffic very close to the 850 runners on and amazingly some runners who felt they could squeeze through impossibly small gaps between other runners and vehicles on that same road...what were they thinking!?. The event could benefit by having some sport drink sponsorship there too or something a more in the goodie bag than leaflets and promos. Well worth another go though and reasonable value. Date of review: December 13, 2009
|
2009 Chiltern Chase 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Beautiful scenic course, good facilities, welcoming organisers. Date of review: June 9, 2009
|
2009 Woodley 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, all facilities provided,. Well done. Date of review: May 18, 2009
|

| |