In short: Great race! In full: First thanks are due to Chris and Andy of Active Leisure Events, who organised this great race. Also many thanks to the others who took responsibility for the race and the marshals, who all gave up their day so that we could take part in a race.
This was the first time I've done the Chester marathon. It will be the last, I fear, as it's far from home and I plan to cut down on marathons.
It's not flat; there are a few hills: my Garmin made the gross climb 180m, which is not as flat as Brighton, but flatter than Kent Coastal (Thanet), both of which I've run before. The weather was pretty good; pretty still and warm, but not hot.
The roads were closed which was a great. The course was a pleasure to run. Chester race course is a great race HQ. My impression was that this race could get much bigger; indeed given its excellent reports I was surprised there weren't many more runners. The course could take a lot more runners. The racecourse seemed unstressed with the numbers. I went by train so missed the car park delays some have referred to.
The whole day was brilliant. The chips don't seem to be as reliable as one might hope and this could cause some problems. Also the mile 24 marker was a few hundred meters too early which momentarily raised in my mind the possibility of what would likely have been an unique achievement.
Overall these were two fairly minor drawbacks to a great race. The support in the villages was excellent! I really recommend this race.
In short: Great race. In full: First thanks are due to Race Director Andy Blundell, those who took responsibility for the race, those who helped on the day and the marshals. All of these all gave up their day so that we could take part in a race.
This was the first time I've done the Tonbridge half marathon. I hope it won't be the last.
There are a few hills: my Garmin made the gross climb 138m; for those who've done other local half-marathons, this is a lot hillier than Paddock Wood, and a lot flatter than Tunbridge Wells. The weather was pretty good; pretty still, warm, not hot, but little or no sun.
The roads were closed which was a great. The course was a pleasure to run. K College is a great venue. My impression was that this race, which filled up this year a week or two in advance, could get much bigger. The course could take a lot more runners. K College seemed unstressed with the numbers. I'm not so sure about the car parking, but that seemed OK too. The race HQ is very close to Tonbridge train station, which helps. Perhaps the organisers could think about raising the entry limit a hundred or two for 2014?
The whole day was brilliant apart from the prize-giving, which was a shambles. It's a great idea to have representatives from the sponsors to present the prizes. Unfortunately too many of the prizes and trophies were either awarded initially to the wrong person, or just not awarded at all. I was talking at the end to the man who had won the MV60 trophy in just over 1:30, beating all-but-one of the V50s. A fantastic achievement, but one which went unrecognised, as the prize givers seemed not to be aware that there was a prize and trophy. The MV70 prize and trophy were also not awarded at the prize-giving ceremony. I like it when the announcer gives the times of the prize-winners too. A small point perhaps.
The chips don't seem to be as reliable as one might hope and this could cause some problems. For example the leading V50's chip did not seem to have worked, so I don't think he was awarded his prize or trophy on the day.
Overall these were two fairly minor drawbacks to a great race. The support in Leigh was fantastic! Date of review: September 28, 2013
In short: Marshalling error spoilt an otherwise great race. In full: First thanks are due to Thanet Roadrunners AC, those who took responsibility for the race and the marshals, who all gave up their day so that we could take part in a race. TRAC run a lot of races. A heartfelt thanks from me.
This was the first time I've done the Kent Coastal marathon, though I've done the Thanet 20, an ideal warm-up for a Spring marathon, a couple of times before.
To judge from the website, this race dates back to at least 1988. Interesting to note that in 1988 13 runners beat this year's winning finish time and 47, including no fewer than 7 from TRRC, which I guess is an earlier name for TRAC, beat 3 hours. This year 3 runners beat 3 hours, though I guess 4 or 5 more would have done but for the marshalling error. Truly humbling to see how fast people were 25 years ago; I recognise at least a couple of the sub-3 hour 1988 finishers in this year's list. Good for them! I was also interested to see that 5 of the top 30 finishers were v60 or v65.
I may have a rosy view: I intended to run 16 miles of this as a marathon pace run for a marathon in a few weeks' time, aiming to cut my pace for the last 10 miles. However in the end after the marathon pace bit I changed my mind and decided to race it. Fortunately with a good result, so I might have a sunnier view of this race than some.
There are a few slight hills, almost all in the first half: my Garmin made the gross climb 214m, which is low in my experience for such a long run; not much hillier than Brighton Marathon, the only other marathon I've run. The weather was pretty good; warm, not hot, but little or no sun. The wind, which I am told nearly always blows in Thanet, was quiet today, except for a horrid short patch in the third quarter of the race.
The race started nearly 7 minutes late, due to long toilet queues. There are of course never enough toilets at the start of a race, but this wasn't great. Apart from that others have written about the marshalling error. I heard about it from a couple of team-mates who weren't pleased either. It's a shame this spoilt the race for those affected. I wasn't fast enough to be affected, but it's clearly a serious issue. The error took place at probably the worst point for a marshal to be missing, since it was a turnback point and there is no way the runners could have worked this out. Clearly a sign to back up the marshal would have helped.
Enough of that. This is a great Autumn marathon for those who live in Kent. I hope to do it again.
For those thinking about doing it next year, the first half is quite busy, as the half-marathon runners add to the numbers. The second half can be quite lonely. For a few km, from about 23km to 27km, I could see practically no-one in front of me. I was worried I'd taken the wrong route, but I hadn't. For much of the race the runners share the route with walkers, dogs, joggers, people drinking tea, etc. Most of these were very supportive, as were the marshals. For some reason for the last 10km I was running very close to others, which I prefer.
Please keep it up TRAC. I think you're great, but do think about marshals and signs for 2014. Date of review: September 2, 2013
In short: Great race, well done to the organisers In full: Thanks to Wadhurst Runners and Nice Work plus those who helped on the day, from the bag drop, to the car park wardens to the marshalls who stood out in the heat for hours to help and encourage us round.
It was a great race, what a great idea to run around this well-known local reservoir and I can't wait to get back next year. I've run this three times now but never run another 15 mile race, so it's perhaps not fair to mark it low on personal best possibilities, but I think most people would agree with me. Whilst the scenery is beautiful, the race is largely not on roads, though much of the last five miles is. I find it hard to run as fast on trail-type surface, even when, as this year, it was as hard as bone.
Enough about PB possibilities. After about 3/4 mile down a steepish hill, this race is pretty flat for the first ten miles, then it goes on-road, and there are three hills, the last of which reverses the initial 3/4 mile, which is quite hard at the end. My garmin made the total climb 198 metres, which is not a lot for a 15-mile race. However it does feel harder than that, especially when, as today, the temperature was high and the sun out. The reservoir does seem to create some breeze, and the trees do provide shade in many places, but generally not on the three hills in the final five miles.
It was quite hot, 23 Celsius according to my Garmin Connect records. Quite a few people were walking up the hills at the end, so no-one should feel any shame about that!
I agree that providing bottles of water at the stations was very helpful on such a hot day. Personally I'd favour an earlier start, as it can be quite hot in July, even in England, but I guess I'm in a minority.
Finally I must repeat my thanks to Wadhurst Runners who are I think quite a small club in numbers, but large in achievement and ambition! Date of review: July 14, 2013
In short: Great race, a must run. In full: As usual the first point is to thank the organisers and marshalls for giving their time. The marshalls were very supportive. In my view this is a really great race for Spring marathon preparation, though for me it's best treated as a training run rather than a race. The scenery is highly varied. Overall the course is interesting but pretty flat.
Thanks to TRAC for organising this. The effort put in by clubs like yours is greatly appreciated. Also thanks to whoever decided this was a Kent Grand Prix event. The same again next year please!
The club I belong to sent 20 runners on a 120- mile round trip, leaving at about 06:30, which shows what we think of it.
Even the weather was good, with little wind and some sun.
I heard a lot, none good, about the short cross-country bit. I didn't mind it, but clearly I was in the minority.
I'm not bothered about goody bags. For me some water, a momento and some chocolate is more than enough. For me the important features are marshals, to stop me getting lost, and water stations.
If I can avoid injury and get there I'll be there next year. Please run it again! Date of review: March 6, 2013
In short: Great race, but hilly. In full: First thanks to Deal Tri for organising this excellent race. Thanks in particular to the marshals who gave hours of their time, were very cheerful and did an excellent job in some very cold and windy weather.
First the hills. This is certainly a hilly half-marathon. According to mapometer the gross climb is 290m. This year my Garmin made it to be 227m. Somehow it didn't feel that hilly, since none of the hills were that long, though there were a lot of them. I thought the scenery was brilliant. No tractors this year. Generally I noticed very little traffic.
I'm surprised there hasn't been more comment about the wind. This was very cold and strong on the way out, but was less noticeable, in fact gave some help, on the way back.
The HQ area offered ample cheap parking. It's also a café which is very useful; I ate a full English Breakfast for £5.90 after the race. The start/ finish area was excellent. The machine printing out details of your run a few yards from the finish line was missing this year, which was a shame. The drinks stations were fine for me; thanks to those who operated them.
I like the mug; there was a nice medal too! The Mars bar was most welcome. Definitely a great race, but a long way from home for me, so I'll probably only do it again if I can get a lift there. So long as it's a Kent Grand Prix race that's quite likely. Date of review: February 12, 2013
In short: Great scenery, but a few points In full: Thanks to Invicta East Kent Athletics Club for organising this and to those who turned out on the day to help, especially the marshals, who gave up their time so we could enjoy the race.
The scenery was great and I really enjoyed the course though it was a bit wet, and a bit narrow not so much at the start but about half a mile in. The sun came out just about as the race started, which was excellent. The weather was warm for the time of year but windy in places.
I don't mind a mug or a medal, but wasn't keen on the bag.
A couple of minor points. We arrived early and the car parking was easy, with bays clearly marked. There were some areas, e.g. the tennis courts where marshals might have helped. Also the instructions asked people not to park on certain roads near the start as the race was die to take part. Maybe I missed them, but there seemed to be no signs or marshals on the day to help with this.
It's great to have a bag drop, but it would have been easier for those who had given up their time to do this if they had labels to stick on bags.
I prefer to get the race number and chip before hand, but I can see the advantage to the organisers in not posting them. Date of review: January 28, 2013
In short: Well done and thanks to the organisers and marshals. In full: First thanks to the marshals for giving up their time on this rather wet day. Thanks also go to the organisers for making this happen and the spectators for their support.
It's a great idea to run a half-marathon, which I did, and a full marathon, at the same time. I don't live in the area but I gather there isn't a Preston marathon or half-marathon. Perhaps this will inspire people to organise one more frequently.
I expect it took a lot of organising to get the roads closed for the races. Personally I'm not a big fan of this sort of double out and back route, as I prefer a loop. I do agree loops are harder to organise, though. Also using big roads as these races did was useful on a wet day like yesterday, as they drained pretty well and were quite level.
Well done Preston! Date of review: October 29, 2012
In short: Excellent race well done to Staplehurst Carnival/ Nice Work In full: Thanks to Staplehurst Carnival Committee and Nice Work for organising this excellent race. Thanks to the marshals for giving up their time so that we could all run the race.
I thought this was an excellent race, the countryside was good. Most of it was along roads which were shared with traffic, but most of the roads were not very busy and the cars seemed to cope well with the runners.
This is definitely a race for improving one's 10K personal best.
We missed the signs for the car parking in the field in which the start and finish took place. However we parked easily enough anyway. The race was well-marshalled, but there was little local support. Perhaps this will grow as the race grows.
This year 243 finished the race compared to 118 last year, which I guess speaks for the success of the race.
As to details of the distance and gross climb, according to my Garmin, these were 9.93km and 25m respectively. Thus the race is much flatter than the Larkfield 10K, which itself is very flat. Date of review: June 17, 2012
In short: Excellent race, well done Harvel Hash House Harriers. In full: Thanks to Harvel Hash House Harriers for organising this excellent 5-mile race. Thanks to the many support staff, marshals etc who gave up their time, and opportunity to run the race, so that we could.
To me the race felt flat/ downhill with two short hills, but in fact it was basically slightly uphill for the first half and slightly downhill for the second half.
The car park was fine as was the start/ finish area. The pub was very handy and looked an excellent place to spend time drinking beer.
The location is pretty rural and the instructions were quite right to say not to approach from the East. We did, due to a combination of road works and getting lost. The road we used was basically single-track with limited passing places.
The scenery was excellent, a mixture of country road and woods.
For those who like details, according to my Garmin the race was 7.97km long and the gross climb was 65m. Date of review: June 6, 2012