Latest Ratings
| 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
2006 Rough 'n' Tumble 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Just the best cakes ever! In full: Great organisation, challenging in a positive way with a very friendly atmosphere. Only in its second year but already a classic. Date of review: January 17, 2006
|
2005 Rough 'n' Tumble 10
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Beautiful scenery and hard work but well worth it with fantastic cakes. In full: Definitely a winner and a much better course than the Terminator, which is staged by the same organiser in the same area. Fantastic views some hard hills but lost of great multi-terrain running through woods, fields and over hilltops. Don't miss the next one! Date of review: March 31, 2005
|
2005 The Terminator 10
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Too many too big hills and bottle necks so pacing was impossible. In full: Lovely scenery but coming to a halt through bottlenecks, including the last leg to the finish, and through facing hills that were so steep everyone walked meant that the pace and continuity of the race were spoiled. The same organiser arranged the Rough N Tumble 10 earlier in the year in the same area and that was much more rewarding and although tough didn't suffer from the above problems. Date of review: March 31, 2005
|

| |