Latest Ratings
| 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
2009 Percy Pud 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Love this one - just one big niggle - organisers said race delay was 30 minutes and then changed their mind. ! Not really fair on a few of the runners making their way to the start at just after 9.50 to hear the claxton go off!! Date of review: December 6, 2009
|
2009 Helen's Trust Golden Gate 10k
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Brilliant 10k route - definitely do it again In full: Didn't expect the hill at the beginning to be quite so steep or long. Brilliant race though. Organisation was great, no queuing in or out. Bit hemmed in at the beginning due to slower runners starting too far forward but that said will be back next year. Date of review: May 31, 2009
|
2006 BUPA Great North Run
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Absolutely fantastic - the best half marathon I have done by a long chalk. Orgnanisation brilliant. Atmosphere brilliant. Crowds brilliant - what more can I say. Definitely up for this next year. Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 Theo's 10K for Sheffield Children's Hospital
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent race, lovely scenery, very well orgnaised - perhaps the distance could do with re-measuring though! General concensus is that it was a short 10k but brilliant nevertheless. Date of review: April 16, 2006
|
2004 Barnsley 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well worth turning up for. Date of review: November 14, 2004
|
2004 Chesterfield Spire 10
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Challenging course through some lovely countyside and very well organised. Date of review: September 5, 2004
|
2003 Askern 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: This was a lovely run with a couple of good hills. The spectators were brilliant even coming out with hosepipes as the weather was extremely hot. Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |