Latest Ratings
| 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
2006 Chernobyl 10K
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyable, testing, worth running Date of review: January 29, 2006
|
2004 L1310K Half-Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: testing but worth it Date of review: October 14, 2004
|
2004 BUPA Great North Run
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Too much waiting around at start but worth it at the end. In full: Runners need to be strictly lined up according to their speed as its very unhelpful when at the 1st mile marker runners in front need to walk! And my start position was correct, 7.5 min mile marker. Make the fat slow ones start at the back!!!!!!!!!!!!! Date of review: October 2, 2004
|

| |