My Event Ratings

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Great Marshalling and organisation (even the weather)
Date of review: March 27, 2011

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Excellent organisation and Marshall support
In full: also like to thank the army cadets doing a great job at the water stations
Date of review: March 28, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		100%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		100%

In short: Faultless
In full: Excellent support, organisation etc.
Many thanks to the people of Halstead for their support, the excellent job the Marshalls and Cadets did and the seemingly unlimited supply of jelly babies.

Date of review: May 11, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: excellent organisation as usual including the weather again
Date of review: April 22, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: Excellent as ever from Bedford Harriers
Date of review: April 6, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		40%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: OK
In full: Took me 30 minutes from M1 to car park due to long traffic jam trying to get in ( normally takes 5 minutes) this was at 9:15 plus got taken a different route to the instructions
Defintely needs some time markings at start to help prevent congestion.
Chip timing is all well and good but no timing indications means unless you start on the front line you are bound to be held up by slower runners.
Baggage area looked very crowded so was fortunate not to need it.
If it is to remain a sizable event I think they need to improve the organisation reduce its size
Date of review: March 9, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: great organisation, marshalling and atmosphere
In full: Rain, wind and water added to the challenge to make it thoroughly enjoyable.
If you are just looking for a fast time maybe not the race for you. If you enjoy getting out and running for the hell of it then ideal.
Date of review: March 17, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: excellent organisation
In full: varied course, thoroughly enjoyable despite (or maybe because of) the weather
Date of review: December 3, 2007

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: excellent organisation, great fun.
In full: An undulating course which makes it all the more challenging/interesting. Great Marshalling, especially liked the Goldwing club helping and the kids thoroughly enjoyed the fun run.
Date of review: April 11, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		100%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		100%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: friendly, well organised, professional and great fun
Date of review: March 27, 2006

Report this rating to the moderator