My Event Ratings

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		40%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		60%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: An averge race
In full: Overall not a bad course, a couple of challenging inclines. My only moan was the start. It was not clear when the start actually happened as you could not hear the starter, only noticable when people started to move, therefore my time was completely different to the main time. Maybe a thought for next time is to have chip timing or zoned starts to prevent faster runners the need to overtake slower runners at the beginnig, as going through the park was not so bad,but narrow for the amount of runners.
Date of review: September 7, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		80%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: A good scenic race, with playful challenges.
In full: Overall a good race, a couple of teething problems at the beginnig, trying to orgainse everyone at the start. Next time have a megaphone. A good challenging route, just a bit confusing with runners in front swapping sides on the roads. Good off road bit near to the finish and well marshalled. Agree with the toilet situation for women. Lovely goody bag, cholcolate needed at the right time.
Date of review: June 22, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		80%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		60%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: A well orgainised race with a variety of terrain.
Date of review: June 14, 2008

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		40%
Would you do it again?		Maybe
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		20%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: First time, very mixed feelings, would be a great course for a PB if only there was less people walking in front.
Date of review: September 18, 2005

Report this rating to the moderator