Latest Ratings
| 1 to 10 of 10 ratings | Page: 1 |
2009 Hogsmill Ladies 5
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: thank you lovely Allsorts Date of review: May 10, 2009
|
2007 Blackpool Fylde Coast Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: a lot of concrete and chip smells but lovely people Date of review: June 4, 2007
|
2007 Whitstable 10K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovley windy seaside 10k Date of review: May 8, 2007
|
2007 Wimbledon Premier 10K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: only one uphill so a quick but dear 10k Date of review: March 12, 2007
|
2006 Abingdon Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: lovley race but it is quick - if you are slow (plus 5h) you WILL be lonely at the back In full: I really loved it. It was my first mara and the marshalls were great. As advertised they did time up until 6h and beyond, but plodding in at 5h24m there was a lot of time when we could not see another runner. This is fine but I think you need to be aware of it! Date of review: October 24, 2006
|
2006 Bushy Park Time Trial 5K
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: we're really lucky to have this event In full: it's an event really not a race but my whole family has done it, from my 35 mins 8 year old to my sub 20 thin spouse - works for us all. My Teen was comfortable running on his own - wouldn't be true of many no track events. Date of review: August 5, 2006
|
2006 Hogsmill Ladies 5
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: lovely race I'll be back In full: a lovely comeback race after a year off Date of review: May 8, 2006
|
2005 Reading Half Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 20% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: cold late race, no sports drink left, too few loos at the end and ages to leave Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2004 London Flora Light Challenge for Women 5K
 | | Overall score | | 20% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: sorry -the queues of walkers put me off doing this again - it's a jolly event but it's not a race Date of review: September 12, 2004
|
2003 Richmond Race for Life 5K
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: News to no one but Race for life still converts beginners and brings a tear to the eye Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |