Latest Ratings
| 1 to 4 of 4 ratings | Page: 1 |
2008 Gloucester 50km (Epney)
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good event overall with a few crucial blindspots... In full: Enjoyed this event and the course is fair and almost traffic free. Stewards were friendly and helpful. My only real gripe would be the almost total absence of mileage or Km markers in the 50k race (There was also a marathon). Having three markers in a 31 mile race is JUST NOT ENOUGH. Feedback on pacing is crucial for gauging your performance. This is a bewildering flaw in anotherwise fine race. Date of review: January 28, 2008
|
2006 Gloucester 100k
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Superb Event! Couldn't Praise Highly Enough! Date of review: April 6, 2006
|
2005 Edinburgh Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Bad value.....Better races elsewhere. Particularly for those travelling. Date of review: June 14, 2005
|
2003 Virgin London Marathon
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A big let-down for the serious runner.....not really a running race, more of a fund raising day out. Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |