I know what you mean. Unfortunately I have binned or given away all my old copies as they were just causing clutter. It was to avoid the clutter that I was considering getting the e-version of the mag. Then I could save them for rereading without them taking up any space.
I let my subscription to Runners World lapse a couple of years ago. Today I decided I would renew my subscription and get the magazine as a download to my tablet. The cost of a 12 month subscription to download is £35.30 yet if I opt to subscribe via this website and have the magazine posted to me, the cost is only £29.99. I would have thought that if there was going to be a price difference it would be the printed and posted magazine that would be more expensive. Does anyone know why the electronic version of Runners World costs more than the printed version?
Hi Peter, Unfortunately I live and work in Rossendale which is to the north of this event also I am coming off working a Saturday night shift to do this run so I don't think I would have enough time to get to the south of Manchester and back again. Hopefully someone else will be able to help you out. Sorry.
I have a problem seeing my everyday watch without my reading glasses on. I can't run with my reading glasses on, so I would like advice on which GPS/HRM has the largest and clearest display to give me the best chance of being able to see it whilst running? I have searched the internet and the Polar RS800CX appears to have the best display but it is hard to tell from images on the web. Thanking you all in advance, Cheers Boggins.
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
Banjaxed
