 |
|
 PC2 |
|
| Posted: 04/04/13 21:51:52 52 |
Fair do's! Alias names can be so helpful can't they  |
 Debate this in the forum |
|
| PC2 |
|
| Posted: 04/04/13 21:36:45 45 |
Iron - a message on the Shinfield 10k Facebook page says its not Po10, not sure if this influences your decision | |
Debate this in the forum |
|
| PC2 |
|
| Posted: 04/04/13 21:34:04 04 |
Got a second session in tonight, probably the first time since June I've got to the track twice in a week. The plan is to keep up the Thursdays and do shorter reps, the middle distance group train elsewhere and I go in with the 200-400m guys. Today was on my own though, and of my own design. 8x200m with 200 jog rec at target 800m pace (29s).
Ended up 31, 32, 32, 32, 33, 32, 32, 33 with 50-58 on the recovery. Pretty tough as our track is always windy (on top of Greenham Common) and today was worse than usual - all the excuses but I think thats the few seconds difference. A nice way to destroy the legs in just under 12mins! | |
Debate this in the forum |
|
| PC2 |
|
| Posted: 04/04/13 08:56:42 42 |
Phil, "Journey?", this aint some episode of X Factor! I'm sure we all know some running Diva's though... | |
Debate this in the forum |
|
| PC2 |
|
| Posted: 02/04/13 22:05:09 09 |
After a week off running I started back up with two easy 10k runs yesterday. Then my first track session since August tonight,10 x 400 with 1 min rec - 70, 69, 68, 68, 68, 69, 68, 68, 66, 65 felt pretty good on a windy track. A nice session to get back into it. Just read back to the parkrun debacle. Interesting... Question: What time is needed to make the rankings. I notice that even for parkrun the rankings show a chip and gun time. How does that work with parkrun? Looks like 19:00 gets a ranking | |
Debate this in the forum |
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
