 |
 |
Mike Scott 11 |  
|
| Posted: 05/04/13 13:36:21 21 |
Hi Matt,
Not strictly a physio Q but as you know about sports medicine....
I was also having slight knee issues 2 weeks back after 20 mile run but physio gave me same advice you are giving & that seems loads better. However, following that I was off work with a virus for a few days. First comeback run was great but since then my 10k tempo runs feel awful & heart monitor shows BPM 5-7 secs higher for same pace as a few weeks back - so I reduced my effort. Feel like I've lost loads of fitness suddenly & cough cold may be returning! How long is this likely to last? Could I be OK for 21st April? Will I retain fitness despite illness? Any advice welcome. Physiologically what's going on?!
Thanks, Mike |
Debate this in the forum |
 |
Mike Scott 11 |  
|
| Posted: 30/01/13 16:31:52 52 |
Hi Martin, (Really interested to hear answers to AgentGinger's & Ian Stantham, as I'm in the same boat, in that my target Marathon pace is 8min per mile(-ish see later) & my 10k pace is 7 mins per mile,so running slower than 9min per mile feels 'unnatural/poor in form'). My specific question, though, is around what pace to set off on, for the London Marathon in April. Although my last marathon time (2009) was 4:05 (I got severe calf cramp last 5 miles, which returned every time I went faster than a crawl). My half time is 1:40 & my 10k is 43:50, so all the calculators suggest I could potentially do a 3:30 marathon. At 54 this may be my last marathon so I'm torn between setting off at 8mpm to try to achieve the best possible time, or a more conservative 8:30mpm (3:45 target) so as not to blow it again & maybe go over 4 hours again! Obviously if I set off at 8:30pace I'll never get near a 3:30 finish, even if I feel good & increase my pace later in the race. So difficult! Can I perhaps use my training times (I'm doing tempo, intervals & a long run at 8:30pace each week & the Silverstone Half in March) to judge the pace I should start at? Or is all that all irrelevant, as I failed to break 4 hours last time? NB I read recently that negative splits aren't always the best way of achieving a PB, so I'm tempted to try 8mpm & see if I can hold on(?). Please advise a very confused runner. Thanks |
Debate this in the forum |
 |
Mike Scott 11 |  
|
| Posted: 18/01/13 13:47:37 37 |
Thanks for the advice Steve - all makes sense. I will try adapting & even try some long slow running (sounds pleasant! as well as the 15 seconds slower than target race stuff. The advice about 3:45 target is obviously sensible & seeing Bob's PB of 4:20 off the back of running 10ks at 40mins makes me think I am being hopeful with a 3:30 figure. I'm doing the Silverstone half in March as a fast(ish) training run & practice of big race atmosphere. If that goes miraculously well & I come in around 1:35-1:37 do you think it is still too much to set off in April at 8min per mile & see if I can keep it up (I suspect I know the answer)? I'm just thinking at my age I may never have a chance again of sub 3:30 & if I set off too slow I'll never make up the lost time. Cheers, Mik |
Debate this in the forum |
 |
Mike Scott 11 |  
|
| Posted: 18/01/13 13:05:48 48 |
Seems several people in this thread are asking similar questions about the benefits of the long slow run. I'm very interested in that as my schedule doesn't currently allow for a LSR as well as a long run 15-30 seconds slower that target marathon pace (FIRST plan)? |
Debate this in the forum |
 |
Mike Scott 11 |  
|
| Posted: 17/01/13 20:18:46 46 |
Incidentally, is it obvious how to join the webchat tomorrow? I'm fairly new to Runners World site & haven't done a live webchat before.......... |
Debate this in the forum |
 |

| |