bos1


Latest posts by bos1

1 to 10 of 4,463

Police

Posted: 18/03/2015 at 14:42
During a conversation at work someone mentioned special constables.Turns out there were four sc's out of about 100. All of them were young. What scared me was that two out of the four were not people who I would want to give any authority to in the workplace.

It seems to me the police forces increasing rely on unpaid minimally trained volunteers, with a core of full-time police who are directed toward making sure crime stats don't embarrass the politicians.

Police

Posted: 18/03/2015 at 14:28
+1 astis

Ched Evans

Posted: 09/01/2015 at 17:28
Nayan wrote (see)
IF CHed Evans deserves to be hounded out of football because he did something bad, or is the wrong sort, or whatever then so do the rest. Except that it hasn't happened - because football fans and clubs alike are (a) as a group very stupid indeed and (b)  hypocrites when it comes to signing someone to score goals for their club

...

Have you considered that perhaps Ched Evans has got the treatment that he has, in part as a reaction to the treatment of the victim.

She is entitled to anonymity - she has been named and targeted by Evans supporters and family. We should note that a member of Evans family tried to film the act that Evans was subsequently convicted of.
The victim has had to move house and change house and lives in fear of her life.

Perhaps that has some bearing on why many supporters don't want him at their football club.

In addition, there is possibly less tolerance in these post-Saville days for rapists and for people who might be seen to have gotten away with it.

Ched Evans

Posted: 09/01/2015 at 17:15
Dustin wrote (see)

Hand on heart, if I was on the jury I'm not sure I'd have found him guilty.




This is why there is a court and jury system.
The fact is that people like you heard all the evidence and came to conclusion he was guilty. And as has been pointed out, the case has been through the appeal system. So it is not as if no one has considered the facts until now. I has been through a trial and two applications for appeal.

My learned friend, Gideon, is incorrect when he suggest that there is a retrial. There is no retrial in process. The case is being reviewed by the CCRC. This will review to see whether there has been a miscarriage of justice. This review takes place because Evans has asked for it. He is entitled to this review just like any other guilty person. The CCRC in the past has recommended something of the order of 3% cases be retried.
It seems unlikely that Evans will get a retrial.

So perhaps, Dustin, should ask yourself what point of law or evidence you have not considered that the jurors and the judges have considered in coming to the verdict.

As far as I know this is a reasonable summary of what was considered:

http://footylaw.co.uk/2015/01/06/ched-evans-sifting-facts-from-fiction/

Ched Evans

Posted: 09/01/2015 at 01:06
Jeez, you are as stupid as you look.
Re % of rapes - what level of education have you attained? I'm guessing you didn't get to college. So why should I start educating you? The fact I quoted a case whereby a policeman suppressed ACTUAL RAPE CASES could give you a clue that it might be possible to start to make estimates. I also quoted Rotherham. Did you read about that genius boy?
But don't worry. People with college degrees did studies. So feel free to disregard them cos you dunt loik the results.

Dear Genius, I never contended that accusation = guilt. You clearly did not read what was in the post
"No accusation = no guilt" where did you pull that from? That exists only in your world, not in civilisation. Did you think that through? Or did you just think you invented a loophole whereby you could rape babies without consequence?

That's really going full stretch for moron of the year.

But anyways. As I said you cant tell the difference between 'rape' and ''not rape'. You have not moved your position forward by as much as a scintilla from that point.

Ched Evans

Posted: 08/01/2015 at 23:42
The more you laugh, the more it looks like you are the sort of human being that cannot tell the difference between 'rape' and 'not rape'.

Ched Evans

Posted: 08/01/2015 at 23:31
Laugh away.

Ched Evans

Posted: 08/01/2015 at 23:31
'An investigator from the Metropolitan police specialist sex crimes unit has admitted failing to investigate the alleged rapes and sexual assaults of 12 women by faking police reports, failing to pass on forensic evidence and not interviewing suspects.

The activities of detective constable Ryan Coleman-Farrow ??? who pleaded guilty to 13 counts of misconduct in public office on Wednesday ??? focus attention once more on Scotland Yard's sapphire unit, which is supposed to be the gold standard for rape investigations across the country. Coleman-Farrow's omissions in 13 rape and sexual assault investigations over three years have left 11 men suspected of rape and sexual assault at large, and his misconduct means the cases are "incapable of full and proper investigation" and will always remain unsolved.'

That's just one officer. Just think what you can suppress if you are a police force like Rotherham.

But the point you want to make, Gideon, is that sex is risky for men because men might be falsely accused?

There are are almost certain more uninvestigated rapes than there are false allegations of rape.
It is estimated that 5% of rapes are prosecuted.

Of course Ched Evans thinks he's not guilty.
He relies on people like you to give him the intellectual underpinnings for his 'considered opinion'.

Ched Evans

Posted: 08/01/2015 at 23:18
You laughed first.
Then you said you didn't know the facts.

Rape is an unreported crime.
When rape is reported it is very difficult to have the police pay attention.

You are part of the problem, Gideon.

Ched Evans

Posted: 08/01/2015 at 22:55
Gideon has made my point for me.

If , on a nice safe forum like runnerwold we have a regular poster like Gideon who cannot tell the difference between "rape" and "not rape", how can we expect a monkey like Ched Evans to understand?
1 to 10 of 4,463

Discussions started by bos1

Anti-virus software

looking for recommendations 
Replies: 14    Views: 1268
Last Post: 20/09/2011 at 09:41

Sex discrimination

Not a bug but ... 
Replies: 10    Views: 3037
Last Post: 16/12/2009 at 15:29

New Garmin 310XT

any tips, advice for starting out? 
Replies: 2    Views: 1943
Last Post: 16/12/2009 at 22:41

Nearly needed an ambulance last night ...

Pain was unbearable 
Replies: 46    Views: 3667
Last Post: 08/10/2009 at 17:30

co2 cartridges

website that sells ... 
Replies: 4    Views: 1527
Last Post: 20/08/2009 at 17:59

Oakley replacement lens

Anyone bought online? 
Replies: 3    Views: 1604
Last Post: 16/12/2007 at 13:34

Shoes for sale

Replies: 1    Views: 1145
Last Post: 25/11/2007 at 14:28

Iboprofen reaction

Replies: 4    Views: 1083
Last Post: 01/11/2007 at 13:29

Mountain bike hols

what gear needed 
Replies: 18    Views: 1002
Last Post: 17/10/2007 at 21:43

Sports massage/physio Marlow Maidenhead area

any recommendations? 
Replies: 3    Views: 2918
Last Post: 14/11/2006 at 16:58

Neck pain

osteo / chiro / physio 
Replies: 3    Views: 806
Last Post: 30/05/2006 at 22:53

shoe size

and weather 
Replies: 5    Views: 377
Last Post: 28/08/2004 at 00:25

Building a bike

Replies: 32    Views: 586
Last Post: 02/09/2004 at 17:16

"New"

Replies: 50    Views: 762
Last Post: 29/01/2005 at 09:31

Basic bike maintenance

Replies: 36    Views: 590
Last Post: 03/08/2004 at 21:48
1 to 15 of 31 threads