Posted: 04/01/2015 at 18:25
No idea if he's done anything illegal or not. Given what was on the front pages of many newspapers, this could be a huge legal shit storm one way or another.
In case you're wondering why the BBC obscured part of the front page of The Times "for legal reasons", that part of the story refers to another person allegedly involved. That person threatened to sue various newspapers when the story first emerged back in 2011.
Next issue of Private Eye should be interesting...