denotes Subscriber-only content | Saturday 21 November 2009 | Personalise | Help  

WIN A PRIZE!

Join Runner's World now

We’re giving away £200 of Asics kit to a new member each month! Sign up and find out more...
why join?  

Members Logon

Email:
Password:
forgot your
password?

Quicklinks

Search this site

New and improved!
 GENERAL
 

SmartCoach Q&As

Since launching SmartCoach - our free, personalised training service - we've been inundated with questions about the science and wisdom behind the custom-made schedules it designs.

And who better to answer your queries than SmartCoach creator, and RW USA Executive Editor, Amby Burfoot? Here we've extracted your most frequently asked questions - along with Amby's answers - from his interactive forum discussion to bring you an insightful glimpse of how the schedules are designed.

Q For a marathon how long do you think the optimum programme should be? I have seen 24-week programmes recommended, whereas the SC schedules all seem to work around 16 weeks. - Dundee Runner

A SC is 16 weeks because we had to pick some number, and that's the one we came up with. I actually like shorter programmes better than longer programmes. I think a lot of runners "go over the top" towards the end of their schedules.

Longer is theoretically better of course, but you have to be more careful. I say, if you're building up for more than 12 to 16 weeks, you'd better be very careful that you have period rest days and weeks in your programme.

Q SC gives me a pace for every run, why not for race day?

A We took a crack at that, but haven't incorporated it into the "live" code yet. Why? Because SC gave people relatively modest improvements and we were afraid that if we showed people these, they’d work backwards and pick a newer/faster program that will actually be detrimental to their training. Any coach can give you a programme that will kill you. The tough thing is providing a programme that you can achieve successfully, and that will also lead to consistent improvement. That's SC's goal.

Q How do I work out, from the training times, a realistic race day pace? Presumably my fitness will increase if I stick to the plan? - Dlb

A In your first races, you should simply aim to start at what feels like a comfortable pace. You'll probably go out too fast anyway, so the more you hold yourself back, the better. In the first mile, you need to keep saying, "Take it easy. Take it easy. Take it easy." After a mile or so, your body will tell you what to do. But don't force it. Stay as relaxed as possible. You should be running hard-but-controlled. You shouldn't feel massively out of breath.

The only way to learn racing is to race. And you'll learn quickly. Everyone does. The good news is, after a race or two, you'll be able to refine your SC training plans to get them exactly on target for your fitness.

Q A lot of other training schedules have a speedwork session every week but SC doesn't tend to do this. Do you think for longer distances (10 mile, half-marathon) you need to do speedwork every week or is it better to do tempo runs some weeks and speedwork every two or three weeks? - Bluesocks

A This is one of those areas where SC, being just a computer program, can't make individual adjustments. It's possible that you or someone else might respond well to more reps. At some point, every runner has to figure out what kind of training he or she enjoys the most, and gets the most benefit from.

In general, SC and I don't believe you need a lot of reps for the half-marathon and marathon unless you are an elite runner. Non-elites mostly have to figure out how to get more efficient, have more endurance, etc.

Q Does SC limit long runs as a percentage of total weekly miles and does it limit weekly mileage increase? Also the easy and tempo paces improve with each four-week cycle but how do you decide by how much? Finally the schedule SC has turned out for a half-marathon (25-30 miles a week, very hard) has a longest run of 13 miles. Do you think that is enough? - M.

A SC does all the things you're implying. The mileage and paces increase on a consistent, graduated basis. This is the "collective wisdom" part of SC. SC also eases you back once a month to make sure you are recovering properly.

I see no reason to go over 13 miles when training for a half-marathon. I know plenty of coaches who don't think you need to go longer than 8 or 10 if the half is your goal. Obviously you will need more if you are building up to a marathon. Finally, as your race distances get shorter, training pace becomes more important than distance.

Q I am aiming to cut my next half-marathon time by 25 per cent - from 2:00 down to 1:40. Are the schedules tailored for this? - Tanya Watson 3

A I'm not sure your goal is very realistic. It could be, but only if you did little training for your first half, and if you have lots of talent. SmartCoach (SC) would never claim to enable you to make that kind of gain. SC is programmed to be conservative, help you improve, but very importantly to keep you from overdoing it and getting injured. SC believes in gradual, successive improvements. A good goal, still challenging in fact, would be a five per cent improvement.

Q The number of times I can run each week is limited, but I also do a lot of cross-training. Can I follow the marathon type program but drop one of the easy runs each week? And do you think it is possible for the 'bigger' athlete to achieve good times over longer distances? - WildWill

A Sure, adjust SC or any other program to whatever suits you best. SC has options for people who can't run many days a week, but you can also change an easy run day to cross training if that works best for you. Here's a thought: The smartest SC user will be the one who takes the parts of SC he likes, and makes adjustments on the other parts. As long as you don't start over-training.

With regard to weight and marathon running, there's no doubt that it's an advantage to be smaller and lighter. Just look at the Kenyans and Ethiopians and Japanese. But Paula's not short, and some big, strong runners are very fast. Again, the only thing any of us can do is to be the best we can be, and make the sport work for us - keep us healthy and fit. That might bring a gold medal to some. But for most of us, it's about personal challenge, satisfaction, and good health.

Q What are your thoughts on 'over-distance' training runs for most race distances? I build my long run to be 10-20 per cent longer than that I am racing. - WildWill

A You're not just wild, you're tough too! I actually think over-distance is often counter-productive. And believe me, I've done a lot of over-distance and learned the hard way.

We distance runners are so damn tough and disciplined that of course we like to do more than we need to. It's admirable to be tough and disciplined. But over-distance is also a big stress; it can increase injury risk, and that's something SC would like to avoid.

SC tries to find a moderate balance of distance, tempo, and speed. SC wants to be an efficient training program. It wants to help you improve with a minimum of miles and effort, not a maximum. It can do this because of the combination of "science" and "collective wisdom" that I keep referring to. Neither of those is a totally precise term. But they form the very basis of SC, and I think it's a good foundation.

Q I plugged in the data for marathon training on a 16-week plan. The result looked sensible, but there was no optional inclusion of half-marathon races as part of the build-up. For me, 16 weeks is a long time to go without any races which may help boost morale, or simply fulfil someone's club responsibilities. Any possibility of a later version including this feature? - Flyaway

A I agree. Races can be very important. SC doesn't know when its users have an opportunity to find a good race, so it wasn't able to say something like "Run the Great North" or anything like that. Also, people will use it at all different seasons of the year. I agree also that the longer your build-up programme, the more you will need a couple of races for motivation, checking up on progress, etc. A note on races: I believe the race should have a very specific purpose. Either use it as a sort of tempo run for a hard, steady effort. Or take a decent taper, and run a fast race. I don't like it when people run races that they haven't tapered for, and then get injured or discouraged by the results. I've done that too often myself. Treat races with respect.

Q I like hills and hilly races, but there are no dedicated hill sessions on a SC schedule. What kind of hill session ratio would be ideal for a moderate marathon schedule - perhaps replacing every other speedwork session? I'm in it for fun and not serious competition. - Heraroja

A You raise a very important point about hills. I think hills can be a big factor in training programs, and in improving race times. Of course, every hill in the world is a different length and incline - as opposed to standard 400m training tracks - so SC doesn't really know how to give hill advice. But run hills, run hills, run hills. They improve power, strength, economy, just about everything.


Bookmark thisPrinter friendly version
Want to send this article to a friend? Please join here
 

Discuss this article, 1 of 5 messages, read more:
Matthew Burrage 
Posted: 21/04/08 18:50:00 00

I have looked at the SC marathon training plan. It has come up with 3 runs per week + optional cross training. Is this really enough as I have seen many other marathon training plans and they advise 4 or five runs per week?

Read more...
Related articles:
Runner's World SmartCoach
Our free interactive training tool provides a schedule that's individualised for your ability and goals