Sennheiser/adidas PMX 680

Summary | Full Review | Reader Reviews | Gallery | Discussion
Our score:

Your score:

Add a review

Add a comment...

For me these are a bit of a scam. The PMX80 (£19.90) is the same design with the exception of the short/long lead option. They both suffer from the same problem all in-ear headphones suffer from which is sweat in the outer ear - this seals the headphone into the ear and the sound is gone. Sound quality is the same (very good) so paying more for the PMX680 (£34) and the luxury of not having too much cable flopping about seems an expensive luxury.

Posted: 20/08/2010 at 13:47

With all the rain we've been having I'm using my swim headphones for running.

Posted: 10/10/2010 at 20:05

The neckband design is OK, but I prefer a pair of earphones where the cabling runs over th ears to the back of the neck.

I've been using the SoundMAGIC E30 for some time in the gym and running in the park.  Sound quality is way better than the CX680, there is no plastic neckband to get in the way and they cost less. Check out reviews online.

Posted: 05/07/2011 at 22:50

Sarah, thanks for that, I've just searched on waterproof headphones and found just what i was looking for, thanks. (neck loop with earbud & solid support)

Posted: 05/11/2011 at 15:58

I have been using my PMX 80 inside and outside for quite a while - no problems at all, never fall out, and the foam covers on the ear pieces negate all issues with sweat etc.

Worth the money.

Brian.

Posted: 05/11/2011 at 20:32


We'd love you to add a comment! Please take half a minute to register as a free member


RW competitions