Last time I wore my Garmin in a race was the Lordshill 10k and the 205 measured 10010meters. Given that the measurers add a small %, I thought that was quite close 
What gets my goat is that when the 205/305 came out, RW tests and Garmin blurb said "this has none of the satelite lock on problems of the 201/301 and will find a signal in under 45 secs.
Now I read "the 405 will have none of the satelite lock on problems of the 205/305, and will lock on to a satelite signal in seconds" or words to that effect.
I have to say that my first 305 used to take a couple of minutes to find a satelite signal, so I sent it back and I got a new one, which in the past 20 months has had no problems finding a signal in anything more than 30 seconds.
Know what you mean.
I wish these people would cut the marketing blurb & actually be up front.
I suppose the same could be said for most politicians - so they`re in good company.
To be fair - once the 305 does get signal (for me - usually 45-60 secs) it holds it pretty well.
It would be nice if someone would perform some objective tests comparing, say, lock on time between 301/305/405 or whatever.
There`s what purports to be a `review` of the 405 in RW. What a load of rubbish. No useful info - just marketing pap. RW ought to be ashamed of itself.
Posted: 30/04/2008 09:09