3 user reviews of New Balance 1063 See all
Posted: 11/11/2009 at 19:24
Barefoot running or Vibrams......
Posted: 11/11/2009 at 19:35
Posted: 11/11/2009 at 19:38
Posted: 11/11/2009 at 21:46
Posted: 11/11/2009 at 22:20
Posted: 11/11/2009 at 22:41
According to fetch I have three pairs coming up to the 800 km mark. I bought one replacement pair of Salomon 3D Pro GTX recently in preparation and the cushioning feels less springy than the pair that's nearly worn out. The others are Asics 2110 and 2140. I'm trying to wear them out but they all keep on going, with no injury problems either.
The conclusion for me is not to throw them out automatically - think of the environment! It maybe helps I only weigh 58 kg and wear them evenly. YMMV.
Posted: 12/11/2009 at 00:32
I have a pair of Mizunos which I bought just for races. I must admit , that when I put on a new pair, they feel great and I'm sure that I gain 3 or 4 seconds per mile. I do agree about the cost of a physio. A "good" pair of shoes is about the same as two visits. Thanks for your advice everyone.
58kg? I'm a skinny stick but I'm 70kg, big bones - it must be. (180cm in height)
Posted: 12/11/2009 at 17:28
According to this site's BMI calculator I'm well inside the normal range with a BMI of 20
As regards racing shoes, there must be a benefit for the lighter weight, but I have never seen any kind of pendulum physics analysis of swinging a weighted foot maybe 1800 times per mile run, but it must get noticeable energetically, after a point.
Posted: 13/11/2009 at 12:24
I spoke too soon. I found this in a paper on shoe protection and running performance:
"It is commonly believed that wearing lighter shoes with fewer protective features cansave energy. While oxygen uptake my be reduced by 1% or so for every 100 grammes of shoeweight saved, the runner’s kinematic adaptations to reduced cushioning has been found toproduce a similar increase in oxygen consumption. Therefore, most runners have little to gain byselecting shoes that lack risk-reducing features."
So minimal cushioning is bad for you too: you don't really gain anything energetically overall, and the risk of injury is greater with minimal cushioning.
Posted: 13/11/2009 at 12:31
Posted: 13/11/2009 at 12:48
Posted: 13/11/2009 at 18:17
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2014 |