Nike Lunareclipse+

Summary | Full Review | Reader Reviews | Gallery | Specs | Discussion
Our score:

Your score:

Add a review

1 to 5 of 8 reviews
AweSimon
Reviewed: 09 December 2011

clunky

look good - okay once you get into it
loose toe box, loose high heel support, weight / clunky
Not my cup of tea and an expensive error on my part. In comparison to the Brooks Ravenna 2 and the Mizuno WaveRider 13 I've used (which were much cheaper), the Nike's were heavier, clunkier and just fit too weirdly for me to like or recommend. The loose toebox was the absolute pits though. I was fitted properly as well, and although ok on the treadmill / in the shop I just couldn't get on with them out on the road.
Score breakdown



Fit:
2.0
Responsiveness:
2.0
Cushioning:
3.0
Comfort:
3.0
Breathability:
2.0
Durability:
4.0
Value:
2.0

AweSimon would not recommend this product
mackfly
Reviewed: 29 June 2011

well made and light but far too bouncy

look good, light and well made.
too much on the heel making for a bouncy feel that lack responsiveness.
Score breakdown



Fit:
4.0
Responsiveness:
2.0
Cushioning:
4.0
Comfort:
4.0
Breathability:
3.0
Durability:
3.0
Value:
2.0

mackfly would not recommend this product
Gareth Evans 31
Reviewed: 27 June 2011

Good, but not great...

Excellent cushioning
Look good (Mine are black and yellow)
Excellent achilles heel protection
Feel a bit clumpy on my quite narrow feet. Much better when pulled very tight but that does cause some distortion of the shoe near the toes.
Seem to make my feet very hot, guess the ventilation is not great.
A decent trainer that I'm pretty pleased with as I got them for a good price online. If I'd paid full whack for them I would be a touch disappointed. I do like how they look and a lot of people comment on how much they like them, but I've bought a pair of Asics Gel Hyperspeed 4 for a lightweight alternative as the Nike's feel a little larger and heavier. No doubt the cushioning is excellent, but with my slight build I think I prefer something a little lighter.
Score breakdown



Fit:
3.0
Responsiveness:
3.0
Cushioning:
5.0
Comfort:
4.0
Breathability:
2.0
Durability:
5.0
Value:
3.0

Gareth Evans 31 would recommend this product
yufang song
Reviewed: 30 May 2011

This shoe is very good. Indeed, very popular this year.

This shoe is so lightweight and comfortable. but also with a very harmonious.I do not want to say how much I like it more, you can buy a pair to go, you will not be disappointed.
This shoe is so lightweight and comfortable. but also with a very harmonious.I do not want to say how much I like it more, you can buy a pair to go, you will not be disappointed.
This shoe is very good. Indeed, very popular this year. And I also know an online store Cristinashop.com. There also have a lot of fashionable and good quality nike shoes. And the price is very cheap. You can go and see. nike shoes really good.
Score breakdown



Fit:
4.0
Responsiveness:
5.0
Cushioning:
5.0
Comfort:
5.0
Breathability:
4.0
Durability:
5.0
Value:
3.0

yufang song would recommend this product
Larny
Reviewed: 17 May 2011

Great cushioned but light high-mileage road shoes

Very light, good support, well cushioned.
The looks!
Just used them for training and then marathon few weeks ago. At no point did my feet or my usually problematic tib post tendon hurt at all, even during the race itself. They look just like new still, despite the miles. I am really delighted with these. The only thing is that they look like bowling shoes, maybe I am not trendy!!??
Score breakdown



Fit:
5.0
Responsiveness:
5.0
Cushioning:
5.0
Comfort:
5.0
Breathability:
5.0
Durability:
5.0
Value:
3.0

Larny would recommend this product
1 to 5 of 8 reviews